Skip to content

Conversation

@tedjpoole
Copy link

Use OpenSSL from the build environment rather than vendoring it.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M label Oct 17, 2025
Signed-off-by: Ted Poole <tpoole@redhat.com>
load("//bazel:repositories.bzl", "define_envoy_implementation")

# Use OpenSSL from the system rather than vendoring it
new_local_repository(

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about the headers? Do we need to explicitly list them here?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I should have converted this to draft. It's still WIP, and I haven't looked at the headers yet.

@tedjpoole tedjpoole marked this pull request as draft October 21, 2025 11:42
@tedjpoole
Copy link
Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@tedjpoole
Copy link
Author

/retest

@tedjpoole tedjpoole marked this pull request as ready for review October 21, 2025 19:13
@jwendell
Copy link

/override ci/prow/unit ci/prow/unit-arm

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 21, 2025

@jwendell: Overrode contexts on behalf of jwendell: ci/prow/unit, ci/prow/unit-arm

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/unit ci/prow/unit-arm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 5ec17e3 into openshift-service-mesh:release-1.27 Oct 21, 2025
3 checks passed
@tedjpoole tedjpoole deleted the alias-openssl branch October 22, 2025 08:44
@tedjpoole tedjpoole mentioned this pull request Oct 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants