Skip to content

Conversation

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

@sdodson sdodson commented Dec 5, 2025

4.21 and 4.22 will have RHCOS 10 images but these are not GA therefore not beholden to FIPS constraints. We will ensure that documentation when these features are made TechPreview specifically mentions that they should not be used in FIPS regulated environments.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from mrunalp and rhmdnd December 5, 2025 19:36
@sdodson sdodson force-pushed the ignore-rhel-coreos-10 branch from e60be9d to 6121335 Compare December 5, 2025 19:40
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 5, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 5, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sdodson
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign ashwindasr for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

4.21 and 4.22 will have RHCOS 10 images but these are not GA therefore
not beholden to FIPS constraints. We will ensure that documentation when
these features are made TechPreview specifically mentions that they
should not be used in FIPS regulated environments.
@sdodson sdodson force-pushed the ignore-rhel-coreos-10 branch from 6121335 to 65c004e Compare December 5, 2025 20:36
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 5, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 5, 2025

@sdodson: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.


# In 4.21 and 4.22 we'll have a rhel-coreos-10 and rhel-coreos-10-extensions image
# these images are devpreview / techpreview and thus not beholden to FIPS validation
# TODO: revisit this after 4.22 branch
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are we tracking that in a ticket anywhere?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, but that's why I moved this to 4.21 config rather than top level config. I assume once branching completes we'll get 4.22 config created here or do we manage that? If so I can go ahead and do that then we can assume that the problem will pop up in our face as soon as 4.22+1 starts getting builds at which point we look at what to do.

Copy link
Contributor

@rhmdnd rhmdnd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Adding @smith-xyz and @richardsonnick for awareness.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 5, 2025
@sdodson sdodson merged commit a0e6b81 into openshift:main Dec 5, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants