Skip to content

Conversation

@andymcc
Copy link
Member

@andymcc andymcc commented Jul 9, 2020

In order for the cluster-logging-operator to be correctly filtered in
the OperatorHub for s390x and ppc64le we need to add the correct arch
label as supported.

(cherry picked from commit 78e1e2b)

In order for the cluster-logging-operator to be correctly filtered in
the OperatorHub for s390x and ppc64le we need to add the correct arch
label as supported.

(cherry picked from commit 78e1e2b)
@periklis
Copy link
Contributor

periklis commented Jul 9, 2020

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 9, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@andymcc: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1855312, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.5.z" release, but it targets "4.6.0" instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1850546 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1855312: Add support label for s390x & ppc64le

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@andymcc andymcc changed the title Bug 1855312: Add support label for s390x & ppc64le [release-4.5] Bug 1855312: Add support label for s390x & ppc64le Jul 9, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@periklis periklis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 9, 2020
@yselkowitz
Copy link

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1855312, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1850546 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@andymcc
Copy link
Member Author

andymcc commented Jul 10, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 10, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@andymcc: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1855312, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1850546 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1850546 targets the "4.6.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.6.0, 4.6.z
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@andymcc
Copy link
Member Author

andymcc commented Jul 10, 2020

/retest

@yselkowitz
Copy link

/assign @jcantrill

@yselkowitz
Copy link

What else is needed to get this approved and cherry-pick-approved?

Copy link
Contributor

@jcantrill jcantrill left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andymcc, jcantrill, periklis

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 23, 2020
@sdodson sdodson added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jul 28, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 38c43a3 into openshift:release-4.5 Jul 28, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@andymcc: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/elasticsearch-operator#420. The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

In response to this:

[release-4.5] Bug 1855312: Add support label for s390x & ppc64le

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

pmoogi-redhat pushed a commit to pmoogi-redhat/cluster-logging-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2022
[release-4.5] Bug 1855312: Add support label for s390x & ppc64le
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants