OCPBUGS-82973: Frrk8s tls manifests#2963
OCPBUGS-82973: Frrk8s tls manifests#2963openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 4 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
Conversation
frr-k8s no longer uses kube-rbac-proxy, but instead exposes the TLS endpoints directly. The TLS parameters (fed by OCP TLS Profile) should be passed as flags to the frr-k8s binaries, to be done in a seperate commit. Signed-off-by: Ori Braunshtein <obraunsh@redhat.com> Assisted-by: Cursor
Signed-off-by: Ori Braunshtein <obraunsh@redhat.com>
We have e2es that rely on the poll-interval being low, here we add a support to modify it through the configmap, to be set by CI lanes. Signed-off-by: Ori Braunshtein <obraunsh@redhat.com> Assisted-by: Cursor
We missed this binary when introducing the configmap Signed-off-by: Ori Braunshtein <obraunsh@redhat.com> Changes to be committed:
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new FRRK8sConfiguration custom resource definition for managing FRR deployment settings, updates the metrics infrastructure from HTTP localhost endpoints to HTTPS on 0.0.0.0, removes the kube-rbac-proxy sidecar containers, and makes deployment configuration more flexible through environment variables sourced from a ConfigMap. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 9 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (9 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 golangci-lint (2.11.4)level=error msg="Running error: context loading failed: failed to load packages: failed to load packages: failed to load with go/packages: err: exit status 1: stderr: go: inconsistent vendoring in :\n\tgithub.com/Masterminds/semver@v1.5.0: is explicitly required in go.mod, but not marked as explicit in vendor/modules.txt\n\tgithub.com/Masterminds/sprig/v3@v3.2.3: is explicitly required in go.mod, but not marked as explicit in vendor/modules.txt\n\tgithub.com/containernetworking/cni@v0.8.0: is explicitly required in go.mod, but not marked as explicit in vendor/modules.txt\n\tgithub.com/ghodss/yaml@v1.0.1-0.20190212211648-25d852aebe32: is explicitly required in go.mod, but not marked as explicit in vendor/modules.txt\n\tgithub.com/go-bindata/go-bindata@v3.1.2+incompatible: is explicitly required in go.mod, but not marked as explicit in vendor/modules.txt\n\tgithub.com/onsi/gomega@v1.39.1: is explicitly required in go.mod, but not marked as explicit in vendor/modules.txt\n\tgithub.com/ope ... [truncated 17356 characters] ... ired in go.mod, but not marked as explicit in vendor/modules.txt\n\tk8s.io/gengo/v2@v2.0.0-20251215205346-5ee0d033ba5b: is explicitly required in go.mod, but not marked as explicit in vendor/modules.txt\n\tk8s.io/kms@v0.35.2: is explicitly required in go.mod, but not marked as explicit in vendor/modules.txt\n\tk8s.io/kube-aggregator@v0.35.1: is explicitly required in go.mod, but not marked as explicit in vendor/modules.txt\n\tsigs.k8s.io/randfill@v1.0.0: is explicitly required in go.mod, but not marked as explicit in vendor/modules.txt\n\tsigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v6@v6.3.2: is explicitly required in go.mod, but not marked as explicit in vendor/modules.txt\n\n\tTo ignore the vendor directory, use -mod=readonly or -mod=mod.\n\tTo sync the vendor directory, run:\n\t\tgo mod vendor\n" Comment |
|
@fedepaol: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-82973, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
cc @jcaamano |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: fedepaol, jcaamano The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/verified by ci |
|
@fedepaol: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/retest-required |
|
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-windows because this is blocking our BGP workloads and I don't see a possible relation |
|
@jcaamano: Overrode contexts on behalf of jcaamano: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-windows DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
6450620
into
openshift:master
|
@fedepaol: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-82973: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: The following pull request, linked via external tracker, has not merged: All associated pull requests must be merged or unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with Jira Issue OCPBUGS-82973 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state. This PR is marked as verified. If the remaining PRs listed above are marked as verified before merging, the issue will automatically be moved to VERIFIED after all of the changes from the PRs are available in an accepted nightly payload. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@fedepaol: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Aligning the frr-k8s manifests with openshift/frr#128, the 2 major changes are:
new crd introduced
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Infrastructure Updates