[release-4.21] OCPBUGS-78599: Migrate InstallPlan components table to PatternFly Table

[rhamilto]

Summary

Migrates the InstallPlan components table from raw HTML table elements to PatternFly v6 Table components, improving consistency and accessibility across the OLM package UI.

Changes

• Replaced HTML <table>, <thead>, <tbody>, <tr>, <th>, <td> elements with PatternFly v6 components: <PFTable>, <Thead>, <Tbody>, <Tr>, <Th>, <Td>
• Updated install-plan.tsx to use the PatternFly Table API
• Maintains existing functionality while adopting PatternFly design system standards

Test plan

• View InstallPlan details page with resolved components
• Verify the components table displays correctly
• Test table sorting and interaction
• Verify modal preview for component resources still works
• Check responsive behavior on different screen sizes

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rhamilto: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78253, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target either version "4.21." or "openshift-4.21.", but it targets "4.22.0" instead
• expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is ON_QA instead
• expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78253 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.22.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

Migrates the InstallPlan components table from raw HTML table elements to PatternFly v6 Table components, improving consistency and accessibility across the OLM package UI.

Changes

• Replaced HTML <table>, <thead>, <tbody>, <tr>, <th>, <td> elements with PatternFly v6 components: <PFTable>, <Thead>, <Tbody>, <Tr>, <Th>, <Td>
• Updated install-plan.tsx to use the PatternFly Table API
• Maintains existing functionality while adopting PatternFly design system standards

Test plan

• View InstallPlan details page with resolved components
• Verify the components table displays correctly
• Test table sorting and interaction
• Verify modal preview for component resources still works
• Check responsive behavior on different screen sizes

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🚫 Review skipped — only excluded labels are configured. (1)

• do-not-merge/work-in-progress

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 77a39478-8c19-4536-98b4-49bc8b0e5db0

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

📝 Coding Plan

• Generate coding plan for human review comments

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rhamilto: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78600, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78253 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

Migrates the InstallPlan components table from raw HTML table elements to PatternFly v6 Table components, improving consistency and accessibility across the OLM package UI.

Changes

• Replaced HTML <table>, <thead>, <tbody>, <tr>, <th>, <td> elements with PatternFly v6 components: <PFTable>, <Thead>, <Tbody>, <Tr>, <Th>, <Td>
• Updated install-plan.tsx to use the PatternFly Table API
• Maintains existing functionality while adopting PatternFly design system standards

Test plan

• View InstallPlan details page with resolved components
• Verify the components table displays correctly
• Test table sorting and interaction
• Verify modal preview for component resources still works
• Check responsive behavior on different screen sizes

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[rhamilto]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rhamilto: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78600, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78253 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rhamilto: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78599, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78390 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead
• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78390 to target a version in 4.22.0, but it targets "4.21.z" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

Migrates the InstallPlan components table from raw HTML table elements to PatternFly v6 Table components, improving consistency and accessibility across the OLM package UI.

Changes

• Replaced HTML <table>, <thead>, <tbody>, <tr>, <th>, <td> elements with PatternFly v6 components: <PFTable>, <Thead>, <Tbody>, <Tr>, <Th>, <Td>
• Updated install-plan.tsx to use the PatternFly Table API
• Maintains existing functionality while adopting PatternFly design system standards

Test plan

• View InstallPlan details page with resolved components
• Verify the components table displays correctly
• Test table sorting and interaction
• Verify modal preview for component resources still works
• Check responsive behavior on different screen sizes

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[rhamilto]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rhamilto: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78599, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78390 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead
• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78390 to target a version in 4.22.0, but it targets "4.21.z" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[rhamilto]

/jira refresh
/test backend

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rhamilto: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78599, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-78390 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh
/test backend

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

@rhamilto: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[rhamilto]

/approve
/label backport-risk-assessed

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhamilto

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• frontend/OWNERS [rhamilto]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment