CONSOLE-5204: Merge PR templates#16287
CONSOLE-5204: Merge PR templates#16287openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
Conversation
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
jira/valid-reference
|
@logonoff: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/verified bypass |
openshift-ci
bot
added
px-approved
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
verified
|
@logonoff: The DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@logonoff: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
openshift-ci-robot
removed
the
verified
|
/verified bypass |
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
verified
|
@logonoff: The DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request templates undergo structural modernization. The primary template file transitions from HTML-based headers to Markdown formatting, reorganizing sections to emphasize analysis and root cause identification upfront. Section ordering is adjusted to: Analysis/Root cause, Reviewers and assignees, Solution Description, Screenshots/screen recording/design review, Test setup/test cases, and Additional info. A new Browser conformance checklist is introduced covering Chrome, Firefox, and Safari. Concurrently, the separate 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 10✅ Passed checks (10 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md.md (1)
15-28: Optional: Remove extra blank line for consistency.Line 25 contains an extra blank line within the comment block, creating inconsistent spacing between the Console/Docs/PX approver sections.
🧹 Proposed formatting cleanup
Docs approver: /assign <gh-user> - PX approver: /assign <gh-user>🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In @.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md.md around lines 15 - 28, Remove the extra blank line inside the commented approver block so the "Console Approver:", "Docs approver:", and "PX approver:" sections are consistently spaced; edit the comment block containing those labels in .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md.md and delete the stray empty line between the Console/Docs/PX approver lines to make the spacing uniform.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In @.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md.md:
- Around line 42-46: The Browser conformance section (the "**Browser
conformance**:" heading and its checklist) is missing Edge and accessibility
verification; update that checklist to include "- [ ] Edge" and a separate "- [
] Accessibility / a11y testing (WCAG, keyboard, screen readers)" checkbox so
reviewers can mark Edge browser testing and explicit accessibility testing were
performed for UI changes.
---
Nitpick comments:
In @.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md.md:
- Around line 15-28: Remove the extra blank line inside the commented approver
block so the "Console Approver:", "Docs approver:", and "PX approver:" sections
are consistently spaced; edit the comment block containing those labels in
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md.md and delete the stray empty line between the
Console/Docs/PX approver lines to make the spacing uniform.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: c1c5c33b-55cf-49bc-84c7-4a99a3704d86
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md.md.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/devconsole_pr.md
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/devconsole_pr.md
📜 Review details
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md.md (2)
12-13: LGTM: Root cause analysis section.Good addition to require analysis upfront before jumping to solutions. This enforces better problem-understanding and will improve PR quality.
1-46: The PR template filename is already correct; no action needed.The file
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.mdis already properly named and follows GitHub's PR template conventions. The double.md.mdextension mentioned in the original review does not exist in the repository. The file is correctly positioned and will be recognized by GitHub as the default pull request template.The template content itself is well-structured with clear sections for Jira/Bugzilla linking, analysis, reviewers, solution description, test cases, and browser conformance testing—appropriate for an enterprise Kubernetes console project.
> Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
logonoff
changed the title
|
@logonoff: This pull request references CONSOLE-5204 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
| **Solution Description**: | ||
| <!-- Describe your code changes in detail and explain the solution or functionality --> | ||
|
|
||
| **Screenshots / screen recording / design review**: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also split this section into:
- UX Design
- Screenshots / Screen recording
openshift-ci-robot
removed
the
verified
logonoff
force-pushed
the
pr-template
branch
4 times, most recently
from
f39e326 to
bfef079
Compare
Remove legacy console and devconsole PR templates from .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE and add a single consolidated docs/pull_request_template.md. The new template centralizes required PR metadata (fixes, analysis, solution, screenshots, test cases, browser conformance, and reviewers) to standardize submissions and streamline triage and review. See https://docs.github.com/en/communities/using-templates-to-encourage-useful-issues-and-pull-requests/creating-a-pull-request-template-for-your-repository#adding-a-pull-request-template
|
@logonoff: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/verified bypass |
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
verified
|
@logonoff: The DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/approve |
jhadvig
added
plugin-api-approved
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jhadvig, logonoff The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
2 similar comments
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jhadvig, logonoff The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jhadvig, logonoff The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
4 participants
Rename .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/console_pr.md -> .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md.md and refactor its content: convert HTML headings to concise bold section labels, add Analysis/Root cause, Solution Description, Screenshots/screen recording, Test setup/test cases, and Browser conformance checkboxes, and reorganize reviewer/assignee guidance. Also delete .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/devconsole_pr.md. These changes standardize and expand the PR template to capture testing, design artifacts, and browser conformance information.
/label px-approved
/label docs-approved
Summary by CodeRabbit