NO-JIRA: be explicit about unsupported instances without multi-tenancy

[andreasgerstmayr]

Be explicit about the UI plugin not supporting Tempo instances without multi-tenancy:

[openshift-ci-robot]

@andreasgerstmayr: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

In response to this:

Be explicit about the UI plugin not supporting Tempo instances without multi-tenancy:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[andreasgerstmayr]

/retest

[andreasgerstmayr]

/label ux-approved
minimal UX changes

/label qe-approved
tiny change, no QE required

[jgbernalp]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andreasgerstmayr, jgbernalp

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [andreasgerstmayr,jgbernalp]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci]

@andreasgerstmayr: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.