Skip to content

Conversation

@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

This PR:

  • add error checking when looking for the "write" alias
  • batches deletes to avoid cases where ES doesn't like a really long url (e.g. too long frame)

This PR may not resolve the issue as it looks like there is possibly a security exception related to an expired token. It will add some additional info to the logs to hopefully expose more for debugging

Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1866019

@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick release-4.5

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jcantrill: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.5 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 12, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jcantrill: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1866019, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1866019: Delete indices in batches

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 12, 2020
@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 12, 2020
indices.sort()
print ','.join(indices)
for i in range(0, len(indices), 25):
print ','.join(indices[i:i+25]) + " "
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

doesn't ', '.join( yield you the same? the trailing " " looks odd to me here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

probably, experimenting in a debug pod wasn't fun so did what i could. ill update it

@ewolinetz
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 12, 2020
indices.sort()
print ','.join(indices)
for i in range(0, len(indices), 25):
print ', '.join(indices[i:i+25])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the trailing space should be removed. Indices are expected to be joined by comma without spacing. See https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/multi-index.html

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

BTW, shouldn't the join be implemented like strings.Join(indices,",") ?
import "strings" // is needed

Copy link
Contributor

@lukas-vlcek lukas-vlcek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
Left some comments.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 13, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ewolinetz, jcantrill, lukas-vlcek

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [ewolinetz,jcantrill]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 6a5483d into openshift:master Aug 13, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jcantrill: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/elasticsearch-operator#454. Bugzilla bug 1866019 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1866019: Delete indices in batches

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jcantrill: new pull request created: #456

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants