Skip to content

NO-JIRA: Improve commit and PR guidance in AGENTS.md#8373

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 2 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
bryan-cox:improve-commits-in-agentsmd
Apr 30, 2026
Merged

NO-JIRA: Improve commit and PR guidance in AGENTS.md#8373
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 2 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
bryan-cox:improve-commits-in-agentsmd

Conversation

@bryan-cox
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bryan-cox bryan-cox commented Apr 29, 2026

What this PR does / why we need it:

Improves the Commit Messages section in AGENTS.md and adds a new Pull Requests section to guide AI agents (and contributors) through the commit restructuring and PR creation workflow.

  • Replaces the indirect pointer to .cursor/rules/git-commit-format.mdc with inline key points and a reference to the git-commit-format skill (works across all AI coding tools, not just Cursor)
  • Adds a "Restructuring Commits Before PR Submission" subsection directing agents to use the restructure-hypershift-commits skill before creating PRs or after addressing review comments
  • Adds a "Pull Requests" section covering pre-PR checklist, PR title format, draft mode workflow, and post-review commit reorganization

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

N/A

Special notes for your reviewer:

Documentation-only change to AGENTS.md.

Checklist:

  • Subject and description added to both, commit and PR.
  • Relevant issues have been referenced.
  • This change includes docs.
  • This change includes unit tests.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated development process documentation, including commit message standards and PR workflow guidelines
    • Added new validation and formatting requirements for commits and pull request titles

@openshift-merge-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: LGTM mode

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@bryan-cox: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

What this PR does / why we need it:

Improves the Commit Messages section in AGENTS.md and adds a new Pull Requests section to guide AI agents (and contributors) through the commit restructuring and PR creation workflow.

  • Replaces the indirect pointer to .cursor/rules/git-commit-format.mdc with inline key points and a reference to the git-commit-format skill (works across all AI coding tools, not just Cursor)
  • Adds a "Restructuring Commits Before PR Submission" subsection directing agents to use the restructure-hypershift-commits skill before creating PRs or after addressing review comments
  • Adds a "Pull Requests" section covering pre-PR checklist, PR title format, draft mode workflow, and post-review commit reorganization

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

N/A

Special notes for your reviewer:

Documentation-only change to AGENTS.md.

Checklist:

  • Subject and description added to both, commit and PR.
  • Relevant issues have been referenced.
  • This change includes docs.
  • This change includes unit tests.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Apr 29, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 29, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: ea9c9483-73e0-46c6-a027-dbc1158b546c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 298e389 and cb93318.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • AGENTS.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR updates AGENTS.md to replace prior gitlint/commit-message guidance with instructions to use the git-commit-format skill and validate via make run-gitlint. It forbids Jira IDs in commit messages (Jira ticket IDs must appear in PR titles; limited NO-JIRA: usage allowed). It mandates running restructure-hypershift-commits before creating a PR and again before any force-push after review. PR workflow changes: open draft PRs, manually trigger CI with /test <job-name>, use /auto-cc and /assign for reviewers/assignees, apply required labels, and mark “Ready for Review” only after tests pass.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 12
✅ Passed checks (12 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: updating AGENTS.md documentation to improve guidance for commit messages and PR workflows.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed PR modifies AGENTS.md (documentation only), contains no Go test files or Ginkgo test code that could violate naming rules.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed This pull request is a documentation-only change to AGENTS.md with no Ginkgo test code to review.
Microshift Test Compatibility ✅ Passed This pull request is a documentation-only change to AGENTS.md and does not add any new Ginkgo e2e tests.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ✅ Passed This pull request is a documentation-only change to AGENTS.md and does not add, modify, or remove any Ginkgo e2e tests. The SNO compatibility check is not applicable.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed This PR is a documentation-only change to AGENTS.md with no modifications to deployment manifests, operator code, or controllers that could introduce scheduling constraints.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed This PR is a documentation-only change to AGENTS.md with no code modifications, binaries, or test code, making the OTE Binary Stdout Contract check inapplicable.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed This pull request is documentation-only (AGENTS.md) with no new Ginkgo e2e tests added.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Review rate limit: 8/10 reviews remaining, refill in 7 minutes and 46 seconds.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@bryan-cox bryan-cox force-pushed the improve-commits-in-agentsmd branch 2 times, most recently from d20975a to 298e389 Compare April 29, 2026 15:02
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@AGENTS.md`:
- Around line 209-216: Update the "Docs" entry so it matches the stated commit
format by either making the scope explicit or marking the scope as optional:
change the line that reads “Docs (`docs:`)” to show the full pattern used
elsewhere (e.g., “Docs (`docs(<scope>):`)” or “Docs (`docs` or
`docs(<scope>):`)”), and/or add a short note in the "Commit Messages" format
rule that the scope is optional; ensure the AGENTS.md entry and the Commit
Messages rule are consistent so agents/githooks expecting `<type>(<scope>):
<description>` will not fail.
- Around line 188-196: Update AGENTS.md to correct the statement that "make
run-gitlint" enforces required footers and no trailing whitespace: inspect the
repository's .gitlint configuration and explicitly state only the actual rules
enabled (e.g., type allowlist and line-length limits) and remove or reword
claims about required-footer and trailing-whitespace enforcement; mention that
agents should run make run-gitlint to validate configured rules and point
readers to the .gitlint file for the authoritative rule set (referencing "make
run-gitlint", "gitlint", ".gitlint", and AGENTS.md to locate the change).
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 6037325e-aa31-4d5b-8435-63c322d64e42

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60802b1 and c002744.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • AGENTS.md

Comment thread AGENTS.md Outdated
Comment thread AGENTS.md Outdated
Comment on lines +209 to +216
1. **API** (`feat(api):`) — `api/` types and go.mod (excluding generated files)
2. **Vendor** (`chore(api):`) — `vendor/`, `client/`, generated files (`zz_generated*`, `zz_fixture_*`)
3. **CLI** (`feat(cli):`) — `cmd/cluster/`, `cmd/install/`, `cmd/nodepool/`, `product-cli/`
4. **HO** (`feat(hypershift-operator):`) — `hypershift-operator/`, `support/`, `karpenter-operator/`, `pkg/`
5. **CPO** (`feat(control-plane-operator):`) — `control-plane-operator/`, control plane sidecars
6. **E2E** (`test(e2e):`) — `test/`, `api/**/*_test.go`
7. **Docs** (`docs:`) — `docs/`, `examples/`

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Make “Docs” commit example consistent with the stated commit format.

Your earlier rule states commit format as <type>(<scope>): <description>. But the component mapping uses “Docs (docs:)” with no (scope) (Line 215). If gitlint requires a scope, the example will fail and agents will follow a bad pattern.

🔧 Suggested doc change
- 7. **Docs** (`docs:`) — `docs/`, `examples/`
+ 7. **Docs** (`docs(docs):`) — `docs/`, `examples/`

If you intended scope to be optional for some commit types, consider explicitly stating that in the “Commit Messages” format rule.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
1. **API** (`feat(api):`) — `api/` types and go.mod (excluding generated files)
2. **Vendor** (`chore(api):`) — `vendor/`, `client/`, generated files (`zz_generated*`, `zz_fixture_*`)
3. **CLI** (`feat(cli):`) — `cmd/cluster/`, `cmd/install/`, `cmd/nodepool/`, `product-cli/`
4. **HO** (`feat(hypershift-operator):`) — `hypershift-operator/`, `support/`, `karpenter-operator/`, `pkg/`
5. **CPO** (`feat(control-plane-operator):`) — `control-plane-operator/`, control plane sidecars
6. **E2E** (`test(e2e):`) — `test/`, `api/**/*_test.go`
7. **Docs** (`docs:`) — `docs/`, `examples/`
1. **API** (`feat(api):`) — `api/` types and go.mod (excluding generated files)
2. **Vendor** (`chore(api):`) — `vendor/`, `client/`, generated files (`zz_generated*`, `zz_fixture_*`)
3. **CLI** (`feat(cli):`) — `cmd/cluster/`, `cmd/install/`, `cmd/nodepool/`, `product-cli/`
4. **HO** (`feat(hypershift-operator):`) — `hypershift-operator/`, `support/`, `karpenter-operator/`, `pkg/`
5. **CPO** (`feat(control-plane-operator):`) — `control-plane-operator/`, control plane sidecars
6. **E2E** (`test(e2e):`) — `test/`, `api/**/*_test.go`
7. **Docs** (`docs(docs):`) — `docs/`, `examples/`
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@AGENTS.md` around lines 209 - 216, Update the "Docs" entry so it matches the
stated commit format by either making the scope explicit or marking the scope as
optional: change the line that reads “Docs (`docs:`)” to show the full pattern
used elsewhere (e.g., “Docs (`docs(<scope>):`)” or “Docs (`docs` or
`docs(<scope>):`)”), and/or add a short note in the "Commit Messages" format
rule that the scope is optional; ensure the AGENTS.md entry and the Commit
Messages rule are consistent so agents/githooks expecting `<type>(<scope>):
<description>` will not fail.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 29, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bryan-cox

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 29, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bryan-cox

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 29, 2026
Replace the indirect pointer to .cursor/rules/git-commit-format.mdc
with a reference to the git-commit-format skill. Add a restructuring
commits subsection directing agents to use the
restructure-hypershift-commits skill before creating PRs or after
addressing review comments.

Signed-off-by: Bryan Cox <brcox@redhat.com>
Commit-Message-Assisted-by: Claude (via Claude Code)
@bryan-cox bryan-cox force-pushed the improve-commits-in-agentsmd branch from 298e389 to 61d57a2 Compare April 29, 2026 15:04
Add guidance for agents on PR creation workflow including pre-PR
checklist, PR title format with Jira IDs, draft mode workflow, and
post-review commit reorganization.

Signed-off-by: Bryan Cox <brcox@redhat.com>
Commit-Message-Assisted-by: Claude (via Claude Code)
@bryan-cox bryan-cox force-pushed the improve-commits-in-agentsmd branch from 61d57a2 to cb93318 Compare April 29, 2026 15:07
@bryan-cox
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/area ai

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added area/ai Indicates the PR includes changes related to AI - Claude agents, Cursor rules, etc. and removed do-not-merge/needs-area labels Apr 29, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
AGENTS.md (1)

188-189: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Clarify what make run-gitlint actually validates.

The current phrasing could mislead readers into thinking gitlint validates the required footers mentioned. The actual .gitlint configuration only enforces conventional commit types and line-length limits (120 chars for title, 140 for body)—not required footers or trailing whitespace. These footers are handled by the git-commit-format skill separately.

📝 Suggested clarification
-Use the `git-commit-format` skill for formatting rules and required footers. Validate with `make run-gitlint`. Do NOT put Jira IDs in commit messages — they belong only in PR titles.
+Use the `git-commit-format` skill for formatting rules and required footers (Signed-off-by, Commit-Message-Assisted-by). Validate commit format and line lengths with `make run-gitlint`. Do NOT put Jira IDs in commit messages — they belong only in PR titles.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@AGENTS.md` around lines 188 - 189, The doc wording is misleading about what
make run-gitlint checks; update the sentence referencing `make run-gitlint` and
`git-commit-format` to clarify that `make run-gitlint` runs the repository's
.gitlint rules (enforcing conventional commit types and title/body line-length
limits) while the `git-commit-format` skill enforces required footers and
trailing-whitespace rules; specifically, change the line that currently reads
"Validate with `make run-gitlint`. Do NOT put Jira IDs..." to explicitly state
that `.gitlint` enforces commit type and length limits (120/140) and that
required footers are enforced by the `git-commit-format` skill. Ensure mentions
of `make run-gitlint`, `.gitlint`, and `git-commit-format` are present so
readers know which tool validates which rule.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Duplicate comments:
In `@AGENTS.md`:
- Around line 188-189: The doc wording is misleading about what make run-gitlint
checks; update the sentence referencing `make run-gitlint` and
`git-commit-format` to clarify that `make run-gitlint` runs the repository's
.gitlint rules (enforcing conventional commit types and title/body line-length
limits) while the `git-commit-format` skill enforces required footers and
trailing-whitespace rules; specifically, change the line that currently reads
"Validate with `make run-gitlint`. Do NOT put Jira IDs..." to explicitly state
that `.gitlint` enforces commit type and length limits (120/140) and that
required footers are enforced by the `git-commit-format` skill. Ensure mentions
of `make run-gitlint`, `.gitlint`, and `git-commit-format` are present so
readers know which tool validates which rule.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: f710707c-8550-4671-8584-285c11ca71e3

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c002744 and 298e389.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • AGENTS.md

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 29, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 36.46%. Comparing base (60802b1) to head (cb93318).
⚠️ Report is 23 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8373   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.46%   36.46%           
=======================================
  Files         765      765           
  Lines       93256    93256           
=======================================
  Hits        34010    34010           
  Misses      56532    56532           
  Partials     2714     2714           
Flag Coverage Δ
cmd-support 30.34% <ø> (ø)
cpo-hostedcontrolplane 37.05% <ø> (ø)
cpo-other 35.69% <ø> (ø)
hypershift-operator 47.89% <ø> (ø)
other 28.37% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@bryan-cox
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/verified bypass

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Apr 29, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@bryan-cox: The verified label has been added.

Details

In response to this:

/verified bypass

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Comment thread AGENTS.md
- Proper line length limits
- Required footers
- No trailing whitespace
Use the `git-commit-format` skill for formatting rules and required footers. Validate with `make run-gitlint`. Do NOT put Jira IDs in commit messages — they belong only in PR titles.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if we could validate this change with #8382

@enxebre
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

enxebre commented Apr 30, 2026

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 30, 2026
@openshift-merge-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification

No second-stage tests were triggered for this PR.

This can happen when:

  • The changed files don't match any pipeline_run_if_changed patterns
  • All files match pipeline_skip_if_only_changed patterns
  • No pipeline-controlled jobs are defined for the main branch

Use /test ? to see all available tests.

@bryan-cox
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/verified bypass

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@bryan-cox:

Details

In response to this:

/verified bypass

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@hypershift-jira-solve-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

hypershift-jira-solve-ci Bot commented Apr 30, 2026

I now have the complete picture. Here is the analysis report:

Test Failure Analysis Complete

Job Information

  • Prow Job: pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-verify-workflows
  • Build ID: 2049857075466473472
  • Target: verify-workflows
  • Org/Repo: openshift/hypershift
  • PR: #8373 (NO-JIRA: Improve commit and PR guidance in AGENTS.md) by bryan-cox
  • Base SHA: ca91011a
  • PR SHA: cb933182
  • Duration: ~4 minutes (14:23:05Z → 14:27:28Z)

Test Failure Analysis

Error

OUTDATED: .github/workflows/test.yaml has been updated on main since this branch diverged.

Rebase your branch on main: git fetch upstream main && git rebase upstream/main

Summary

The verify-workflows presubmit check failed because .github/workflows/test.yaml was modified on main after PR #8373's branch diverged. Commit 15b9f1363 ("CNTRLPLANE-3308: deps: bump k8s.io 0.34 → 0.35 and openshift/api (#8286)") merged into main and updated test.yaml, but the PR branch (based on 60802b1b) does not include that change. The PR itself only modifies AGENTS.md and has no conflict — a simple rebase onto current main will resolve this.

Root Cause

The verify-workflows CI job compares the GitHub Actions workflow files (.github/workflows/) between the PR branch and the current main branch. It computes the merge-base (60802b1b) and checks whether any workflow files were modified on main between that merge-base and the current main HEAD (ca91011a).

The commit 15b9f1363 ("CNTRLPLANE-3308: deps: bump k8s.io 0.34 → 0.35 and openshift/api (#8286)") was merged into main after PR #8373's branch was created. That commit modified .github/workflows/test.yaml as part of a dependency bump. Since the PR branch diverged before this commit, the verify-workflows check correctly detects that the PR branch has a stale copy of the workflow file and fails the job.

This is not a product bug or a CI infrastructure issue — it is a branch-staleness guard working as designed. The PR only changes AGENTS.md (a documentation file) and has no functional conflict, but the CI policy requires the branch to be current with any workflow file changes on main.

Recommendations
  1. Rebase the PR branch onto current main to pick up the updated .github/workflows/test.yaml:
    git fetch upstream main && git rebase upstream/main
    git push --force-with-lease
  2. Re-trigger the job after pushing the rebased branch — Prow will automatically re-run presubmits, or use /retest in a PR comment.
  3. No code changes are needed in the PR itself — AGENTS.md has no interaction with the workflow file.
Evidence
Evidence Detail
Failed check verify-workflows — staleness guard for .github/workflows/ files
Outdated file .github/workflows/test.yaml
PR branch base 60802b1b (merge-base between PR and main)
Main HEAD at test time ca91011a
Commit updating test.yaml on main 15b9f1363 — "CNTRLPLANE-3308: deps: bump k8s.io 0.34 → 0.35 and openshift/api (#8286)", merged after branch diverged
PR files changed AGENTS.md only (no workflow files touched)
Exit code 1 (container test in pod verify-workflows)
Job duration ~4 minutes

@bryan-cox
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/override ci/prow/verify-workflows

This is just a change in the agents file.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 30, 2026

@bryan-cox: Overrode contexts on behalf of bryan-cox: ci/prow/verify-workflows

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/verify-workflows

This is just a change in the agents file.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 30, 2026

@bryan-cox: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit a5a1fcf into openshift:main Apr 30, 2026
25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/ai Indicates the PR includes changes related to AI - Claude agents, Cursor rules, etc. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants