Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

[openshift-bot]

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. bugzilla/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-machine-api-operator.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
  are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
  of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
  from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask for approval from alexander-demichev after the PR has been reviewed.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6	4264b0c	link	false	/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade	4264b0c	link	true	/test e2e-aws-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere	4264b0c	link	false	/test e2e-vsphere
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator	4264b0c	link	true	/test e2e-aws-operator
ci/prow/unit	4264b0c	link	true	/test unit
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade	4264b0c	link	false	/test e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade
ci/prow/verify-crds-sync	4264b0c	link	true	/test verify-crds-sync
ci/prow/images	4264b0c	link	true	/test images
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-serial	4264b0c	link	true	/test e2e-vsphere-serial
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-upgrade	4264b0c	link	false	/test e2e-vsphere-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws	4264b0c	link	true	/test e2e-aws
ci/prow/e2e-azure	4264b0c	link	false	/test e2e-azure
ci/prow/yaml-lint	4264b0c	link	true	/test yaml-lint
ci/prow/e2e-openstack	4264b0c	link	false	/test e2e-openstack
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack	4264b0c	link	false	/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-virtualmedia	4264b0c	link	false	/test e2e-metal-ipi-virtualmedia
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-operator	4264b0c	link	false	/test e2e-vsphere-operator
ci/prow/e2e-azure-operator	4264b0c	link	false	/test e2e-azure-operator
ci/prow/goimports	4264b0c	link	true	/test goimports
ci/prow/golint	4264b0c	link	true	/test golint
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-tech-preview	4264b0c	link	false	/test e2e-aws-operator-tech-preview
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator	4264b0c	link	false	/test e2e-gcp-operator
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi	4264b0c	link	false	/test e2e-metal-ipi
ci/prow/e2e-libvirt	4264b0c	link	false	/test e2e-libvirt
ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive	4264b0c	link	false	/test e2e-aws-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-gcp	4264b0c	link	false	/test e2e-gcp
ci/prow/govet	4264b0c	link	true	/test govet

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: No Jira bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'OCPBUGS-XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. bugzilla/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-machine-api-operator.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
  are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
  of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: No Jira bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'OCPBUGS-XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. bugzilla/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-machine-api-operator.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
  are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
  of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: No Jira bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'OCPBUGS-XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. bugzilla/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-machine-api-operator.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
  are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
  of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: No Jira bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'OCPBUGS-XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. bugzilla/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-machine-api-operator.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
  are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
  of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: No Jira bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'OCPBUGS-XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. bugzilla/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-machine-api-operator.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
  are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
  of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: No Jira bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'OCPBUGS-XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. bugzilla/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-machine-api-operator.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
  are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
  of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: No Jira bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'OCPBUGS-XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. bugzilla/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-machine-api-operator.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
  are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
  of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: No Jira bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'OCPBUGS-XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. bugzilla/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-machine-api-operator.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
  are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
  of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: No Jira bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'OCPBUGS-XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. bugzilla/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-machine-api-operator.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
  are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
  of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: No Jira bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'OCPBUGS-XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. bugzilla/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-machine-api-operator.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
  are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
  of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: No Jira bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'OCPBUGS-XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. bugzilla/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-machine-api-operator.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
  are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
  of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: No Jira bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'OCPBUGS-XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. bugzilla/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-machine-api-operator.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
  are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
  of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: No Jira bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'OCPBUGS-XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added.

In response to this:

Updating ose-machine-api-operator images to be consistent with ART
TLDR:
Component owners, please ensure that this PR merges as it impacts the fidelity
of your CI signal. Patch-manager / leads, this PR is a no-op from a product
perspective -- feel free to manually apply any labels (e.g. bugzilla/valid-bug) to help the
PR merge as long as tests are passing. If the PR is labeled "needs-ok-to-test", this is
to limit costs for re-testing these PRs while they wait for review. Issue /ok-to-test
to remove this tag and help the PR to merge.

Detail:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.

The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-machine-api-operator.yml.

The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #aos-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. Downstream builds
  are already being built with these changes. Merging this PR only improves the fidelity
  of our CI.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #aos-art coreos slack channel.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[JoelSpeed]

Might need to get a new PR here, I think closing it will cause a new one to be created if it's still important