Skip to content

daemon/update: use --delete-if-present to delete old kargs#3086

Closed
jlebon wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
jlebon:pr/kargs-daemon
Closed

daemon/update: use --delete-if-present to delete old kargs#3086
jlebon wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
jlebon:pr/kargs-daemon

Conversation

@jlebon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jlebon jlebon commented Apr 13, 2022

Let's make the MCO more resilient to the old state not being what it
expects it to be. In an ideal world, that shouldn't happen but there's
nothing preventing sysadmins from fiddling around with kargs for testing
things and that would throw us off.

Related: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075126

Let's make the MCO more resilient to the old state not being what it
expects it to be. In an ideal world, that shouldn't happen but there's
nothing preventing sysadmins from fiddling around with kargs for testing
things and that would throw us off.

Related: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075126
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from jkyros and sinnykumari April 13, 2022 18:33
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 13, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jlebon
To complete the pull request process, please assign sinnykumari after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @sinnykumari in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jlebon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

jlebon commented Apr 13, 2022

This is more of an RFC after looking at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075126. I'm not sure if it's a good idea.

@jlebon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

jlebon commented Apr 13, 2022

I think this makes sense framing it with Kubernetes' model of eventual consistency. But OTOH, it means that we could end up fighting with something else trying to own parts of the kargs and instead of erroring out upfront, we'd have an eternal battle between the two.

@cgwalters
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

we'd have an eternal battle between the two.

Yeah, this also relates to #245

Dunno. I'm OK with this, but I also feel like we'd want to know when it happens.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 13, 2022

@jlebon: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/unit cb42861 link true /test unit
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade cb42861 link true /test e2e-agnostic-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 13, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Aug 12, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 12, 2022

@openshift-bot: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Sep 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants