MCO-1924: MCO-500: Migrate direct runGetOut() to use CommandRunner in the MCD#5546
Conversation
|
/test all |
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
8b8307f to
332d6cb
Compare
|
/test all |
|
@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1924 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1924 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
3eff651 to
f8b0a00
Compare
|
/lgtm Great cleanup! |
pablintino
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
/lgtm
Agree with the @umohnani8 's LGTM. Thanks for the clean up.
|
/retest-required |
|
@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1924 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
1 similar comment
|
@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1924 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
f8b0a00 to
85c2f58
Compare
9a7b7c7 to
a9ea655
Compare
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.21-periodics-e2e-aws-mco-disruptive-techpreview 1of2 periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.21-periodics-e2e-aws-mco-disruptive-techpreview-2of2 periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-1of3 periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-2of3 periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-3of3 |
|
@isabella-janssen: trigger 5 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/8973d210-fe16-11f0-9a09-c8c7f17d6d20-0 |
|
/lgtm |
|
@umohnani8: The DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: isabella-janssen, pablintino, umohnani8 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest-required |
|
@isabella-janssen: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
- What I did
runGetOutfunction https://github.com/isabella-janssen/machine-config-operator/blob/e52120b2cded908564878b30f7e87efa4709dcd6/pkg/daemon/command_runner.go#L38-L44 and its references in favor of theRunGetOutfunction that makes use of theCommandRunnerOSstruct https://github.com/isabella-janssen/machine-config-operator/blob/e52120b2cded908564878b30f7e87efa4709dcd6/pkg/daemon/command_runner.go#L21-L36CreatePodmanContainerfunction to make use of thePodmanExecInterfacestruct- How to verify it
This is just code refactoring and cleanup, so existing functionality should remain unchanged.
- Description for the changelog
MCO-1924: Migrate direct runGetOut() to use CommandRunner in the MCD