Skip to content

MCO-1924: MCO-500: Migrate direct runGetOut() to use CommandRunner in the MCD#5546

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
isabella-janssen:mco-1924
Feb 4, 2026
Merged

MCO-1924: MCO-500: Migrate direct runGetOut() to use CommandRunner in the MCD#5546
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
isabella-janssen:mco-1924

Conversation

@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Member

@isabella-janssen isabella-janssen commented Jan 12, 2026

- What I did

- How to verify it
This is just code refactoring and cleanup, so existing functionality should remain unchanged.

- Description for the changelog
MCO-1924: Migrate direct runGetOut() to use CommandRunner in the MCD

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 12, 2026
@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Member Author

/test all

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 12, 2026

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 12, 2026
@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Member Author

/test all

@isabella-janssen isabella-janssen changed the title (WIP) MCO-1924 MCO-1924: Migrate direct runGetOut() to use CommandRunner in the MCD Jan 13, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jan 13, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 13, 2026

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1924 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 13, 2026

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1924 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@isabella-janssen isabella-janssen marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2026 14:47
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 13, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from djoshy and yuqi-zhang January 13, 2026 14:48
@umohnani8
Copy link
Contributor

umohnani8 commented Jan 13, 2026

/lgtm

Great cleanup!

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 13, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@pablintino pablintino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
Agree with the @umohnani8 's LGTM. Thanks for the clean up.

@pablintino
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 29, 2026

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1924 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

- What I did

- How to verify it
This is just code refactoring and cleanup, so existing functionality should remain unchanged.

- Description for the changelog
MCO-1924: Migrate direct runGetOut() to use CommandRunner in the MCD

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 29, 2026

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references MCO-1924 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

- What I did

- How to verify it
This is just code refactoring and cleanup, so existing functionality should remain unchanged.

- Description for the changelog
MCO-1924: Migrate direct runGetOut() to use CommandRunner in the MCD

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 30, 2026
@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Member Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.21-periodics-e2e-aws-mco-disruptive-techpreview 1of2 periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.21-periodics-e2e-aws-mco-disruptive-techpreview-2of2 periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-1of3 periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-2of3 periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-3of3

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 30, 2026

@isabella-janssen: trigger 5 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.21-periodics-e2e-aws-mco-disruptive-techpreview
  • periodic-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.21-periodics-e2e-aws-mco-disruptive-techpreview-2of2
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-1of3
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-2of3
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.22-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-3of3

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/8973d210-fe16-11f0-9a09-c8c7f17d6d20-0

@umohnani8
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/verified bypass

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Feb 3, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@umohnani8: The verified label has been added.

Details

In response to this:

/lgtm
/verified bypass

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 3, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 3, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: isabella-janssen, pablintino, umohnani8

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [isabella-janssen,pablintino,umohnani8]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD d464ec8 and 2 for PR HEAD a9ea655 in total

@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Member Author

isabella-janssen commented Feb 3, 2026

/retitle MCO-1924: MCO-500: Migrate direct runGetOut() to use CommandRunner in the MCD

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title MCO-1924: Migrate direct runGetOut() to use CommandRunner in the MCD MCO-1924: MCO-500: Migrate direct runGetOut() to use CommandRunner in the MCD Feb 3, 2026
@pablintino
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD c9188a4 and 1 for PR HEAD a9ea655 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 4, 2026

@isabella-janssen: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 067395e into openshift:main Feb 4, 2026
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants