Skip to content

Conversation

@agullon
Copy link
Contributor

@agullon agullon commented Dec 16, 2025

Move test/image-blueprints/layer4-release toml files into different groups because there are parent dependencies between them.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Dec 16, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 16, 2025

@agullon: This pull request references USHIFT-6407 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from jogeo and pmtk December 16, 2025 11:15
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 16, 2025
@agullon
Copy link
Contributor Author

agullon commented Dec 16, 2025

/test aws-tests-cache aws-tests-cache-arm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 16, 2025

@agullon: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test e2e-aws-ai-model-serving
/test e2e-aws-footprint-and-performance
/test e2e-aws-tests
/test e2e-aws-tests-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-periodic-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-upstream
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-upstream-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-cache
/test e2e-aws-tests-cache-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-periodic
/test e2e-aws-tests-periodic-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-release
/test e2e-aws-tests-release-arm
/test ocp-full-conformance-rhel-eus
/test ocp-full-conformance-serial-rhel-eus
/test test-rpm
/test test-unit
/test verify
/test verify-deps

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test images
/test security
/test test-rebase

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-arm
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-images
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-security
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-test-unit
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-verify
pull-ci-openshift-microshift-main-verify-deps
Details

In response to this:

/test aws-tests-cache aws-tests-cache-arm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@agullon
Copy link
Contributor Author

agullon commented Dec 16, 2025

/test e2e-aws-tests-cache e2e-aws-tests-cache-arm

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 16, 2025

@agullon: This pull request references USHIFT-6407 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Move test/image-blueprints/layer4-release toml files into different groups because there are parent dependencies between them.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 16, 2025

@agullon: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ggiguash
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/verified by ci

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Dec 16, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ggiguash: This PR has been marked as verified by ci.

Details

In response to this:

/lgtm
/verified by ci

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 16, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 16, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: agullon, ggiguash

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 26f0fe0 into openshift:main Dec 16, 2025
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants