USHIFT-6362: Updating scenarios to use the right image#6107
USHIFT-6362: Updating scenarios to use the right image#6107openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
Conversation
|
@kasturinarra: This pull request references USHIFT-6362 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@agullon could you please help review the PR here ? thanks !! |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: agullon, kasturinarra The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/cherrypick release-4.21 |
|
@agullon: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@agullon Fix is already present in 4.21, no need to cherry pick |
|
/retest |
|
@kasturinarra retest failed jobs tomorrow after cache is built from |
|
/retest |
|
/verified by CI |
|
@kasturinarra: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Errors not related to the change. Override to save on CI cycles. |
|
@ggiguash: Overrode contexts on behalf of ggiguash: ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@kasturinarra: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@agullon: new pull request could not be created: failed to create pull request against openshift/microshift#release-4.21 from head openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-6107-to-release-4.21: status code 422 not one of [201], body: {"message":"Validation Failed","errors":[{"resource":"PullRequest","code":"custom","message":"No commits between openshift:release-4.21 and openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-6107-to-release-4.21"}],"documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/pulls#create-a-pull-request","status":"422"} DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/cherrypick release-4.21 |
|
@ggiguash: new pull request could not be created: failed to create pull request against openshift/microshift#release-4.21 from head openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-6107-to-release-4.21: status code 422 not one of [201], body: {"message":"Validation Failed","errors":[{"resource":"PullRequest","code":"custom","message":"No commits between openshift:release-4.21 and openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-6107-to-release-4.21"}],"documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/pulls#create-a-pull-request","status":"422"} DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
with out the change in this PR i see the scenarios are not actually using the right iso to boot up, issue has been discovered when running the tests on 4.21 branch, so updating the code here as well.