USHIFT-6760: Reflect job dates in the periodics top-level report#6380
Conversation
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
jira/valid-reference
|
@ggiguash: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue. DetailsIn response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
WalkthroughAdded a CSS rule to right-align per-job finish dates in collapsible headers and updated the Periodics documentation to require a Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📝 Coding Plan
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
approved
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In @.claude/commands/analyze-ci-for-release-manager.md:
- Line 254: The example HTML is inconsistent: remove the inline
onclick="toggle(this)" from the collapsible header example (since the JavaScript
attaches click handlers to elements with class "collapsible" and there is no
toggle function defined); update the example to show a plain <div
class="collapsible">...<span class="job-date">YYYY-MM-DD</span></div> that
matches the event-listener-based implementation, or alternatively implement and
reference an actual toggle(element) function in the JS if you prefer inline
handlers.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 1c70bec8-e885-432d-a0e4-45d87ca56730
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.claude/commands/analyze-ci-for-release-manager.md
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
do-not-merge/work-in-progress
ggiguash
force-pushed
the
release-manager-periodic-dates
branch
from
1a3e533 to
cfe6ada
Compare
openshift-ci
bot
removed
the
do-not-merge/work-in-progress
|
@ggiguash: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ggiguash, pmtk The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/verified by @ggiguash |
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
verified
|
@ggiguash: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
ggiguash
changed the title
3 participants
Since the analysis is performed for the last run of each periodic, we need to have a clearer indication on when the job ran.
Before
After