[Release-4.19] OCPBUGS-73654: CVE-2026-22029 fix to @remix-run/router to 1.23.2#405
Conversation
|
@MrSanketkumar: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-73654, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
WalkthroughUpdates dev dependency Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 12✅ Passed checks (12 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Review rate limit: 9/10 reviews remaining, refill in 6 minutes. Comment |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@MrSanketkumar: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-73654, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@MrSanketkumar: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-73654, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)
125-126: Prefer exact pin for the CVE resolution override.Using
^1.23.2allows silently pulling newer1.xreleases on futureyarn installcommands; for a security backport on a release branch, exact pinning ensures reproducible and deterministic resolutions.Suggested change
- "@remix-run/router": "^1.23.2" + "@remix-run/router": "1.23.2"🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@package.json` around lines 125 - 126, The dependency resolution for the CVE override uses a caret range for "@remix-run/router" which can pull newer 1.x releases; update the package.json dependency entry for "@remix-run/router" to an exact pinned version (replace "^1.23.2" with "1.23.2") so installs are deterministic and reproducible while leaving "lodash-es" unchanged unless similar pinning is needed.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In `@package.json`:
- Around line 125-126: The dependency resolution for the CVE override uses a
caret range for "@remix-run/router" which can pull newer 1.x releases; update
the package.json dependency entry for "@remix-run/router" to an exact pinned
version (replace "^1.23.2" with "1.23.2") so installs are deterministic and
reproducible while leaving "lodash-es" unchanged unless similar pinning is
needed.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Enterprise
Run ID: 6e40c98d-6231-4cf4-9098-2ac1f20493ef
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
package.json
|
/jira refresh |
|
@MrSanketkumar: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-73654, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)
126-133: Prefer exact pins in resolutions and overrides for clearer CVE remediation intent.Both lines 126 and 132 use
^1.23.2, which resolves to1.23.2in yarn.lock. While the lockfile currently pins the exact version, using1.23.2(without the caret) makes the security fix intent explicit and avoids potential future drift if the lockfile is regenerated.Suggested change
- "@remix-run/router": "^1.23.2" + "@remix-run/router": "1.23.2"Apply this change to both lines 126 and 132.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@package.json` around lines 126 - 133, Update the package.json overrides/resolutions entries for `@remix-run/router` to use an exact version pin instead of a caret range: replace "^1.23.2" with "1.23.2" in both places so the overrides and/or overrides-like block explicitly lock `@remix-run/router` to 1.23.2 (look for the "@remix-run/router" key in the top-level dependencies/resolutions and inside the "overrides" object).
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In `@package.json`:
- Around line 126-133: Update the package.json overrides/resolutions entries for
`@remix-run/router` to use an exact version pin instead of a caret range: replace
"^1.23.2" with "1.23.2" in both places so the overrides and/or overrides-like
block explicitly lock `@remix-run/router` to 1.23.2 (look for the
"@remix-run/router" key in the top-level dependencies/resolutions and inside the
"overrides" object).
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Enterprise
Run ID: bf731621-48fa-412d-84e6-0f783ccae04c
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
package.json
f6b9c76 to
25a94c3
Compare
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@MrSanketkumar: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: MrSanketkumar, upalatucci The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
9893901
into
openshift:release-4.19
|
@MrSanketkumar: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-73654: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-73654 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Fix included in release 4.19.0-0.nightly-2026-05-04-142831 |
Summary by CodeRabbit