OCPBUGS-82579: [release-4.22]: chore: sync with openshift repositories#222
Conversation
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Ignoring requests to cherry-pick non-bug issues: CNTRLPLANE-3226 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
/retitle OCPBUGS-82579: [release-4.22]: chore: sync with openshift repositories |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-82579, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@ingvagabund: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-82579, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@ingvagabund: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-82579, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/retest-required |
| github.com/openshift/build-machinery-go v0.0.0-20251023084048-5d77c1a5e5af | ||
| github.com/openshift/client-go v0.0.0-20251205093018-96a6cbc1420c | ||
| github.com/openshift/library-go v0.0.0-20251205073205-ab8d51820e0b | ||
| github.com/openshift/library-go v0.0.0-20260309173530-9ed71ac3148f |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is this bump required ?
| github.com/gophercloud/gophercloud/v2 v2.4.0 | ||
| github.com/gorilla/sessions v1.2.1 | ||
| github.com/openshift/api v0.0.0-20260105191300-d1c4dc4fd37b | ||
| github.com/openshift/api v0.0.0-20260413132630-e010a985205d |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is this bump required ?
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| replace k8s.io/apiserver => github.com/openshift/kubernetes-apiserver v0.0.0-20260211130612-1431f3222f03 // points to openshift-apiserver-4.21-kubernetes-1.34.1 | ||
| replace k8s.io/apiserver => github.com/openshift/kubernetes-apiserver v0.0.0-20260415154523-acdcc04896b5 // points to openshift-apiserver-4.22-kubernetes-1.34.1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what justifies this bump
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To be up2date with the latest release-4.22 in all cases
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is this required to pick up openshift/kubernetes-apiserver#85 ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
essentially to update the deprecation warning to indicate that removal timelines may change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
openshift/kubernetes-apiserver#85 is relevant only for the DeploymentConfig kind. Which is not served here. So this whole PR can be dropped. It's just to keep it in sync with 4.22.
|
Not needed as this only syncs with the release-4.22 branches. |
|
@ingvagabund: Closed this PR. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-82579. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/reopen |
|
@ingvagabund: Reopened this PR. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-82579, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/lgtm |
|
This is not a backport to already GA'd OCP version. This is a backport due to missing the branching date. /label backport-risk-assessed |
|
@ingvagabund: The label(s) DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/label backport-risk-assessed |
|
@p0lyn0mial: The label(s) DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/verified by CI |
|
@ingvagabund: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ibihim, openshift-cherrypick-robot, p0lyn0mial The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@ingvagabund: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-82579, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
6c6e962
into
openshift:release-4.22
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-82579: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: The following pull request, linked via external tracker, has not merged:
All associated pull requests must be merged or unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with Jira Issue OCPBUGS-82579 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state. This PR is marked as verified. If the remaining PRs listed above are marked as verified before merging, the issue will automatically be moved to VERIFIED after all of the changes from the PRs are available in an accepted nightly payload. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #221
/assign ingvagabund