Skip to content

OSDOCS-5006 & 5007:Automigration for Azure File and Vsphere#55830

Merged
kalexand-rh merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
lpettyjo:OSDOCS-5006_And_5007
May 11, 2023
Merged

OSDOCS-5006 & 5007:Automigration for Azure File and Vsphere#55830
kalexand-rh merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
lpettyjo:OSDOCS-5006_And_5007

Conversation

@lpettyjo
Copy link
Contributor

@lpettyjo lpettyjo commented Feb 10, 2023

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 10, 2023
@lpettyjo lpettyjo added this to the Planned for 4.13 GA milestone Feb 10, 2023
@lpettyjo lpettyjo added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Feb 10, 2023
@tmalove
Copy link
Contributor

tmalove commented Feb 10, 2023

/remove-label peer-review-needed
/label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Feb 10, 2023
@tmalove
Copy link
Contributor

tmalove commented Feb 10, 2023

Hi @lpettyjo will you add a preview link? Thanks!

@lpettyjo lpettyjo force-pushed the OSDOCS-5006_And_5007 branch from 8bee0c8 to e0305ab Compare February 13, 2023 14:51
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Feb 13, 2023

🤖 Updated build preview is available at:
https://55830--docspreview.netlify.app

Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/15984

@tmalove
Copy link
Contributor

tmalove commented Feb 13, 2023

/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
/label peer-review-done
/LGTM

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Feb 13, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 13, 2023
[id="persistent-storage-csi-migration-sc-implications_{context}"]
= Storage class implications

For new {product-title} 4.11, and later, installations, the default storage class is the CSI storage class. All volumes provisioned using this storage class are CSI persistent volumes (PVs).
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's not true for all drivers, i am not sure if a generic statement works here. cc @gnufied

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I don't think that statement works or is true. Either we have to create a table that explicitly lists in which release migration for that particular storage driver went GA or we shouldn't mention this at all.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes i was thinking about this. Maybe a table with the driver name, OCP version of the CSI driver GA as well as the CSI migration GA release / when it defaulted to CSI.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was thinking that since this doc is specific to OCP 4.13, wouldn't the simplest solution be to state that for 4.13 and later, the default SC is the CSI one.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes that would work too. There are some late changes on the vsphere side so I would hold on for the moment

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

@gcharot
Copy link

gcharot commented Mar 23, 2023

@lpettyjo I think we should also remove the important red square from the vsphere CSI doc from the 4.13 docs (4.12 doc for your reference)
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.12/storage/container_storage_interface/persistent-storage-csi-vsphere.html#overview
cc @gnufied

@duanwei33
Copy link

@ropatil010 Please help QE review.

@lpettyjo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lpettyjo I think we should also remove the important red square from the vsphere CSI doc from the 4.13 docs (4.12 doc for your reference) https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.12/storage/container_storage_interface/persistent-storage-csi-vsphere.html#overview cc @gnufied

@gcharot This notice appears with all of the CSI drivers that were migrated. Should I remove it from all of them?

@lpettyjo lpettyjo force-pushed the OSDOCS-5006_And_5007 branch from e0305ab to a3d4e0e Compare May 1, 2023 16:57
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 1, 2023
@lpettyjo lpettyjo added peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR and removed peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR labels May 1, 2023
@kcarmichael08
Copy link
Contributor

/label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label May 1, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice job distilling the info! I had some suggestions, mostly about making the content more modular when there are procedures and concepts mixed in the same module.

Copy link

@duanwei33 duanwei33 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Other looks good to be expect this minor comment.

@lpettyjo lpettyjo force-pushed the OSDOCS-5006_And_5007 branch from 864f67f to e14272b Compare May 8, 2023 12:26
@duanwei33
Copy link

Thanks for the update.
LGMT

@lpettyjo
Copy link
Contributor Author

lpettyjo commented May 9, 2023

#55830 (comment) Done.

@lpettyjo lpettyjo force-pushed the OSDOCS-5006_And_5007 branch 2 times, most recently from fae5f2f to fedb96f Compare May 10, 2023 13:59
@lpettyjo lpettyjo force-pushed the OSDOCS-5006_And_5007 branch from fedb96f to 6e53101 Compare May 10, 2023 14:10
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 10, 2023

@ocpdocs-previewbot: user ocpdocs-previewbot is not trusted for pull request #55830

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 10, 2023

@ocpdocs-previewbot: user ocpdocs-previewbot is not trusted for pull request #55830

@sferich888
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 10, 2023
@gcharot
Copy link

gcharot commented May 10, 2023

LGTM thanks!

@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor

@lpettyjo, it looks like the jobs for this one passed even though the PR says that it's still in progress: https://app.travis-ci.com/github/openshift/openshift-docs/builds/262941024

Please either double-check me and merge or bump the PR to rerun the job.

@gnufied
Copy link
Member

gnufied commented May 10, 2023

lgtm

@duanwei33
Copy link

LGMT from QE side

@ropatil010
Copy link

lgtm

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor

lgtm on behalf of @bertinatto

@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh reopened this May 11, 2023
@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh reopened this May 11, 2023
@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh merged commit 66cc529 into openshift:main May 11, 2023
@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@kalexand-rh: new pull request created: #59906

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.13 lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.