OSDOCS-5006 & 5007:Automigration for Azure File and Vsphere#55830
OSDOCS-5006 & 5007:Automigration for Azure File and Vsphere#55830kalexand-rh merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
Conversation
|
/remove-label peer-review-needed |
|
Hi @lpettyjo will you add a preview link? Thanks! |
8bee0c8 to
e0305ab
Compare
|
🤖 Updated build preview is available at: Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/15984 |
|
/remove-label peer-review-in-progress |
| [id="persistent-storage-csi-migration-sc-implications_{context}"] | ||
| = Storage class implications | ||
|
|
||
| For new {product-title} 4.11, and later, installations, the default storage class is the CSI storage class. All volumes provisioned using this storage class are CSI persistent volumes (PVs). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's not true for all drivers, i am not sure if a generic statement works here. cc @gnufied
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah I don't think that statement works or is true. Either we have to create a table that explicitly lists in which release migration for that particular storage driver went GA or we shouldn't mention this at all.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes i was thinking about this. Maybe a table with the driver name, OCP version of the CSI driver GA as well as the CSI migration GA release / when it defaulted to CSI.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I was thinking that since this doc is specific to OCP 4.13, wouldn't the simplest solution be to state that for 4.13 and later, the default SC is the CSI one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes that would work too. There are some late changes on the vsphere side so I would hold on for the moment
|
@lpettyjo I think we should also remove the important red square from the vsphere CSI doc from the 4.13 docs (4.12 doc for your reference) |
|
@ropatil010 Please help QE review. |
@gcharot This notice appears with all of the CSI drivers that were migrated. Should I remove it from all of them? |
e0305ab to
a3d4e0e
Compare
|
/label peer-review-in-progress |
kcarmichael08
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice job distilling the info! I had some suggestions, mostly about making the content more modular when there are procedures and concepts mixed in the same module.
duanwei33
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Other looks good to be expect this minor comment.
864f67f to
e14272b
Compare
|
Thanks for the update. |
e14272b to
80936c9
Compare
|
#55830 (comment) Done. |
fae5f2f to
fedb96f
Compare
fedb96f to
6e53101
Compare
|
@ocpdocs-previewbot: user ocpdocs-previewbot is not trusted for pull request #55830 |
1 similar comment
|
@ocpdocs-previewbot: user ocpdocs-previewbot is not trusted for pull request #55830 |
|
/lgtm |
|
LGTM thanks! |
|
@lpettyjo, it looks like the jobs for this one passed even though the PR says that it's still in progress: https://app.travis-ci.com/github/openshift/openshift-docs/builds/262941024 Please either double-check me and merge or bump the PR to rerun the job. |
|
lgtm |
|
LGMT from QE side |
|
lgtm |
|
lgtm on behalf of @bertinatto |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.13 |
|
@kalexand-rh: new pull request created: #59906 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Version(s):4.13+
Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-5007 and https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-5006
and https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-5687
Link to docs preview:https://55830--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/storage/container_storage_interface/persistent-storage-csi-migration.html
QE review:
Additional information:
PTAL: @bertinatto, @ropatil010, @gcharot