Skip to content

[GH#42020] [RHDEVDOCS-4353] [BZ#2108987] update supported log forwarding plugins 5.3-5.6#57617

Merged
mburke5678 merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
pfeifferj:update-log-forwarding-plugins
Mar 27, 2023
Merged

[GH#42020] [RHDEVDOCS-4353] [BZ#2108987] update supported log forwarding plugins 5.3-5.6#57617
mburke5678 merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
pfeifferj:update-log-forwarding-plugins

Conversation

@pfeifferj
Copy link
Member

@pfeifferj pfeifferj commented Mar 23, 2023

Version(s):

Issue:

fixes #42020
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDEVDOCS-4353
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2108987

Link to docs preview:

https://57617--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/logging/cluster-logging-external.html#cluster-logging-collector-log-forwarding-supported-plugins-5-3_cluster-logging-external ff

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

  • removed subsequent mentions of syslog changes after they were introduced to avoid redundancy.
  • updated comments with links to version definitions in new test cases
  • created files for OpenShift Logging 5.3-5.6

cf. #56359

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 23, 2023
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

@pfeifferj pfeifferj marked this pull request as ready for review March 23, 2023 08:31
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 23, 2023
@libander
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 24, 2023
@libander
Copy link
Contributor

@kalexand-rh - Merge please?

@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor

@libander, has this been peer reviewed and approved by QE?

@pfeifferj
Copy link
Member Author

hi @kalexand-rh, the changes were already peer-reviewed here: #56359

@kalexand-rh
Copy link
Contributor

And it looks like it was approved by QE on the other PR as well.

@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Mar 27, 2023
@mburke5678 mburke5678 added the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Mar 27, 2023
@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

@pfeifferj Which branches should this be cherrypicked to?

@pfeifferj
Copy link
Member Author

hi @mburke5678 4.8, 4.9, 4.10, 4.11, 4.12 according to the Life Cycle Policy

@mburke5678 mburke5678 removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Mar 27, 2023
@mburke5678 mburke5678 added this to the Continuous Release milestone Mar 27, 2023
@mburke5678 mburke5678 merged commit 9e09e9f into openshift:main Mar 27, 2023
@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.8

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #57819

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.8

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.9

@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.10

@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.11

@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #57822

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #57823

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.10

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #57824

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.11

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #57825

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #57826

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[enterprise-4.9] Issue in file logging/cluster-logging-external.adoc

6 participants