OSDOCS-5670: Remove multicluster references#58093
Conversation
|
@opayne1: This pull request references OSDOCS-5670 which is a valid jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
1 similar comment
|
@opayne1: This pull request references OSDOCS-5670 which is a valid jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
🤖 Build preview is available at: Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/12938 |
|
@opayne1: This pull request references OSDOCS-5670 which is a valid jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
Hi @alimobrem @spadgett could you provide a review of this removal? I will need to do separate PRs for the release notes removal. |
|
changes look good from QE side |
bergerhoffer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, just one question!
| include::modules/web-console-overview.adoc[leveloffset=+1] | ||
| include::modules/multi-cluster-about.adoc[leveloffset=+1] | ||
| include::modules/enabling-multi-cluster-console.adoc[leveloffset=+2] | ||
| // include::modules/multi-cluster-about.adoc[leveloffset=+1] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My only comment is whether these lines in both files can just be deleted instead of just commented out?
Also, should the module files actually be removed (or moved the unused_topics directory)? I'd recommend deleting the lines/removing the modules, unless they are expected to be needed again (then it's fine as is!).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, @bergerhoffer ! This feature is on hold for a few releases. Depending on what they decide to do with the feature, I expect to probably need this content again soon.
|
/label peer-review-done |
|
/lgtm |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.10 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.11 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.12 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.13 |
|
@opayne1: #58093 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.10": DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@opayne1: new pull request created: #58984 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@opayne1: new pull request created: #58985 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@opayne1: new pull request created: #58986 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
OSDOCS-5670: Remove multicluster references
Version(s):
4.13
Need to check if backporting all the way to 4.10 (I think we will need to).
Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-5670>
Link to docs preview:
https://58093--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/web_console/web-console.html
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.12/applications/working_with_helm_charts/understanding-helm.html#additional-resources
QE review:
Additional information:
Release notes will be updated in follow-up PRs.