Skip to content

OSDOCS-5670: Remove multicluster references#58093

Merged
opayne1 merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
opayne1:OSDOCS-5670
Apr 19, 2023
Merged

OSDOCS-5670: Remove multicluster references#58093
opayne1 merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
opayne1:OSDOCS-5670

Conversation

@opayne1
Copy link
Contributor

@opayne1 opayne1 commented Mar 31, 2023

OSDOCS-5670: Remove multicluster references

Version(s):
4.13
Need to check if backporting all the way to 4.10 (I think we will need to).

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-5670>

Link to docs preview:
https://58093--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/web_console/web-console.html
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.12/applications/working_with_helm_charts/understanding-helm.html#additional-resources

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
Release notes will be updated in follow-up PRs.

@opayne1 opayne1 added this to the Planned for 4.13 GA milestone Mar 31, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Mar 31, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 31, 2023

@opayne1: This pull request references OSDOCS-5670 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

OSDOCS-5670: Remove multicluster references

Version(s):
4.13
Need to check if backporting all the way to 4.10 (I think we will need to).

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-5670>

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
Release notes will be updated in follow-up PRs.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 31, 2023

@opayne1: This pull request references OSDOCS-5670 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

OSDOCS-5670: Remove multicluster references

Version(s):
4.13
Need to check if backporting all the way to 4.10 (I think we will need to).

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-5670>

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
Release notes will be updated in follow-up PRs.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 31, 2023
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 31, 2023

@opayne1: This pull request references OSDOCS-5670 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

OSDOCS-5670: Remove multicluster references

Version(s):
4.13
Need to check if backporting all the way to 4.10 (I think we will need to).

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-5670>

Link to docs preview:
https://58093--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/web_console/web-console.html
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.12/applications/working_with_helm_charts/understanding-helm.html#additional-resources

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
Release notes will be updated in follow-up PRs.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@opayne1
Copy link
Contributor Author

opayne1 commented Apr 3, 2023

Hi @alimobrem @spadgett could you provide a review of this removal? I will need to do separate PRs for the release notes removal.

Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@yapei
Copy link

yapei commented Apr 11, 2023

changes look good from QE side

@opayne1 opayne1 added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Apr 11, 2023
@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Apr 11, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, just one question!

include::modules/web-console-overview.adoc[leveloffset=+1]
include::modules/multi-cluster-about.adoc[leveloffset=+1]
include::modules/enabling-multi-cluster-console.adoc[leveloffset=+2]
// include::modules/multi-cluster-about.adoc[leveloffset=+1]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My only comment is whether these lines in both files can just be deleted instead of just commented out?

Also, should the module files actually be removed (or moved the unused_topics directory)? I'd recommend deleting the lines/removing the modules, unless they are expected to be needed again (then it's fine as is!).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @bergerhoffer ! This feature is on hold for a few releases. Depending on what they decide to do with the feature, I expect to probably need this content again soon.

@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor

/label peer-review-done
/remove-label peer-review-needed
/remove-label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Apr 11, 2023
@xltian
Copy link

xltian commented Apr 12, 2023

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 12, 2023
@opayne1 opayne1 merged commit c4ccd30 into openshift:main Apr 19, 2023
@opayne1
Copy link
Contributor Author

opayne1 commented Apr 19, 2023

/cherrypick enterprise-4.10

@opayne1
Copy link
Contributor Author

opayne1 commented Apr 19, 2023

/cherrypick enterprise-4.11

@opayne1
Copy link
Contributor Author

opayne1 commented Apr 19, 2023

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

@opayne1
Copy link
Contributor Author

opayne1 commented Apr 19, 2023

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@opayne1: #58093 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.10":

Applying: OSDOCS-5670: Remove multicluster references
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	applications/working_with_helm_charts/understanding-helm.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging applications/working_with_helm_charts/understanding-helm.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in applications/working_with_helm_charts/understanding-helm.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 OSDOCS-5670: Remove multicluster references
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.10

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@opayne1: new pull request created: #58984

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.11

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@opayne1: new pull request created: #58985

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@opayne1: new pull request created: #58986

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.10 branch/enterprise-4.11 branch/enterprise-4.12 branch/enterprise-4.13 jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants