Skip to content

OSDOCS#8294: adding Agent Known Issue to RNs#66650

Merged
jeana-redhat merged 1 commit intoopenshift:enterprise-4.14from
skopacz1:OSDOCS-8294
Oct 23, 2023
Merged

OSDOCS#8294: adding Agent Known Issue to RNs#66650
jeana-redhat merged 1 commit intoopenshift:enterprise-4.14from
skopacz1:OSDOCS-8294

Conversation

@skopacz1
Copy link
Contributor

@skopacz1 skopacz1 commented Oct 20, 2023

OSDOCS-8294

Version(s):
4.14 only

This PR adds a known issue to the 4.14 release notes regarding failed agent installs on vSphere clusters with multiple worker nodes.

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

preview: Known Issues

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Oct 20, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 20, 2023

@skopacz1: This pull request references OSDOCS-8294 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

OSDOCS-8294

Version(s):
4.14 only

This PR adds a known issue to the 4.14 release notes regarding failed agent installs on vSphere clusters with multiple worker nodes.

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

preview:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@skopacz1 skopacz1 marked this pull request as ready for review October 20, 2023 17:49
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 20, 2023
@skopacz1
Copy link
Contributor Author

/remove-label do-not-merge/work-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 20, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 20, 2023

@skopacz1: The label(s) /remove-label do-not-merge/work-in-progress cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, cloud-experts, cnv, dev-tools, distributed-tracing, ims, jira/valid-bug, merge-review-in-progress, merge-review-needed, mtc, multi-arch, oadp, peer-review-done, peer-review-in-progress, peer-review-needed, rhacs, rhv, sd-docs, serverless, service-mesh, sme-review-done, sme-review-needed, staff-eng-approved, telco. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

Details

In response to this:

/remove-label do-not-merge/work-in-progress

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bscott-rh bscott-rh removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 20, 2023
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Oct 20, 2023

🤖 Updated build preview is available at:
https://66650--docspreview.netlify.app

Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/29510

@skopacz1 skopacz1 changed the title OSDOCS-8294: adding Agent Known Issue to RNs OSDOCS#8294: adding Agent Known Issue to RNs Oct 20, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Oct 20, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@skopacz1: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a jira issue, add 'XYZ-NNN:' to the title of this pull request and request another refresh with /jira refresh.

Details

In response to this:

OSDOCS-8294

Version(s):
4.14 only

This PR adds a known issue to the 4.14 release notes regarding failed agent installs on vSphere clusters with multiple worker nodes.

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

preview:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.


* Broadcom network interface controllers in legacy Single Root I/O Virtualization (SR-IOV) do not support quality of service (QoS) and tag protocol identifier (TPID) settings for the SRIOV VLAN. This affects Broadcom BCM57414, Broadcom BCM57508, and Broadcom BCM57504. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-9881[*RHEL-9881*])

* Agent-based installations on vSphere with multiple worker nodes might fail due to a failure to remove node taint, which causes the installation to be stuck in a pending state.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* Agent-based installations on vSphere with multiple worker nodes might fail due to a failure to remove node taint, which causes the installation to be stuck in a pending state.
* Agent-based installations on vSphere will fail due to a failure to remove node taint, which causes the installation to be stuck in a pending state.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The issue also happens with compact clusters that have no workers.

@skopacz1
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mhanss could you PTAL when you have a chance? Thanks!

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 20, 2023

* Broadcom network interface controllers in legacy Single Root I/O Virtualization (SR-IOV) do not support quality of service (QoS) and tag protocol identifier (TPID) settings for the SRIOV VLAN. This affects Broadcom BCM57414, Broadcom BCM57508, and Broadcom BCM57504. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-9881[*RHEL-9881*])

* Agent-based installations on vSphere will fail due to a failure to remove node taint, which causes the installation to be stuck in a pending state.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add that the SNO cluster is not impacted.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 23, 2023
@mhanss
Copy link

mhanss commented Oct 23, 2023

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 23, 2023
@skopacz1
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Oct 23, 2023
@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

/label peer-review-in-progress

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-label peer-review-needed

Copy link
Contributor

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

/label peer-review-done

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Oct 23, 2023
@skopacz1
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Oct 23, 2023
@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Oct 23, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One question/consideration

/remove-label merge-review-in-progress
/remove-label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Oct 23, 2023
@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat merged commit 6c9f30a into openshift:enterprise-4.14 Oct 23, 2023
@skopacz1 skopacz1 deleted the OSDOCS-8294 branch October 31, 2023 13:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants