Skip to content

OBSDOCS-65: update-monitoring-troubleshooting-sample-code#74236

Merged
bburt-rh merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
bburt-rh:OBSDOCS-65-update-monitoring-troubleshooting-sample-code
Apr 8, 2024
Merged

OBSDOCS-65: update-monitoring-troubleshooting-sample-code#74236
bburt-rh merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
bburt-rh:OBSDOCS-65-update-monitoring-troubleshooting-sample-code

Conversation

@bburt-rh
Copy link
Contributor

@bburt-rh bburt-rh commented Apr 4, 2024

Version(s): 4.12+

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-65

Link to docs preview: https://74236--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/monitoring/troubleshooting-monitoring-issues.html#determining-why-prometheus-is-consuming-disk-space_troubleshooting-monitoring-issues

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
Updates the monitoring troubleshooting content to replace and update sample code and to bring the formatting of the CLI commands into compliance with the OCP docs guidelines.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 4, 2024

@bburt-rh: This pull request references OBSDOCS-65 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.12+

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-65

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
Updates the monitoring troubleshooting content to replace and update sample code and to bring the formatting of the CLI commands into compliance with the OCP docs guidelines.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Apr 4, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 4, 2024
@bburt-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

bburt-rh commented Apr 4, 2024

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 4, 2024

@bburt-rh: This pull request references OBSDOCS-65 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.12+

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-65

Link to docs preview: https://74236--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/monitoring/troubleshooting-monitoring-issues.html#determining-why-prometheus-is-consuming-disk-space_troubleshooting-monitoring-issues

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
Updates the monitoring troubleshooting content to replace and update sample code and to bring the formatting of the CLI commands into compliance with the OCP docs guidelines.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 4, 2024

@bburt-rh: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@bburt-rh bburt-rh requested a review from juzhao April 4, 2024 20:28
@juzhao
Copy link

juzhao commented Apr 7, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 7, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 8, 2024

@bburt-rh: This pull request references OBSDOCS-65 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.12+

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-65

Link to docs preview: https://74236--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/monitoring/troubleshooting-monitoring-issues.html#determining-why-prometheus-is-consuming-disk-space_troubleshooting-monitoring-issues

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
Updates the monitoring troubleshooting content to replace and update sample code and to bring the formatting of the CLI commands into compliance with the OCP docs guidelines.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@bburt-rh bburt-rh added qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Apr 8, 2024
@tmalove
Copy link
Contributor

tmalove commented Apr 8, 2024

/remove-label peer-review-needed
/label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Apr 8, 2024
@tmalove
Copy link
Contributor

tmalove commented Apr 8, 2024

/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
/label peer-review-done

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Apr 8, 2024
@bburt-rh bburt-rh merged commit 18d635e into openshift:main Apr 8, 2024
@bburt-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

bburt-rh commented Apr 8, 2024

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

@bburt-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

bburt-rh commented Apr 8, 2024

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

@bburt-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

bburt-rh commented Apr 8, 2024

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

@bburt-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

bburt-rh commented Apr 8, 2024

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

@bburt-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

bburt-rh commented Apr 8, 2024

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bburt-rh: #74236 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.12":

Applying: OBSDOCS-65-update-monitoring-troubleshooting-sample-code
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	modules/monitoring-determining-why-prometheus-is-consuming-disk-space.adoc
M	monitoring/troubleshooting-monitoring-issues.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging monitoring/troubleshooting-monitoring-issues.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in monitoring/troubleshooting-monitoring-issues.adoc
Auto-merging modules/monitoring-determining-why-prometheus-is-consuming-disk-space.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/monitoring-determining-why-prometheus-is-consuming-disk-space.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 OBSDOCS-65-update-monitoring-troubleshooting-sample-code
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bburt-rh: new pull request created: #74359

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bburt-rh: new pull request created: #74360

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bburt-rh: new pull request created: #74361

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bburt-rh: new pull request created: #74362

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bburt-rh: new pull request could not be created: failed to create pull request against openshift/openshift-docs#enterprise-4.16 from head openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-74236-to-enterprise-4.16: status code 422 not one of [201], body: {"message":"Validation Failed","errors":[{"resource":"PullRequest","code":"custom","message":"A pull request already exists for openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-74236-to-enterprise-4.16."}],"documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/pulls#create-a-pull-request"}

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bburt-rh: #74236 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.12":

Applying: OBSDOCS-65-update-monitoring-troubleshooting-sample-code
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	modules/monitoring-determining-why-prometheus-is-consuming-disk-space.adoc
M	monitoring/troubleshooting-monitoring-issues.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging monitoring/troubleshooting-monitoring-issues.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in monitoring/troubleshooting-monitoring-issues.adoc
Auto-merging modules/monitoring-determining-why-prometheus-is-consuming-disk-space.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/monitoring-determining-why-prometheus-is-consuming-disk-space.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 OBSDOCS-65-update-monitoring-troubleshooting-sample-code
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bburt-rh: new pull request could not be created: failed to create pull request against openshift/openshift-docs#enterprise-4.13 from head openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-74236-to-enterprise-4.13: status code 422 not one of [201], body: {"message":"Validation Failed","errors":[{"resource":"PullRequest","code":"custom","message":"A pull request already exists for openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-74236-to-enterprise-4.13."}],"documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/pulls#create-a-pull-request"}

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bburt-rh: new pull request could not be created: failed to create pull request against openshift/openshift-docs#enterprise-4.14 from head openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-74236-to-enterprise-4.14: status code 422 not one of [201], body: {"message":"Validation Failed","errors":[{"resource":"PullRequest","code":"custom","message":"A pull request already exists for openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-74236-to-enterprise-4.14."}],"documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/pulls#create-a-pull-request"}

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bburt-rh: new pull request could not be created: failed to create pull request against openshift/openshift-docs#enterprise-4.15 from head openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-74236-to-enterprise-4.15: status code 422 not one of [201], body: {"message":"Validation Failed","errors":[{"resource":"PullRequest","code":"custom","message":"A pull request already exists for openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-74236-to-enterprise-4.15."}],"documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/pulls#create-a-pull-request"}

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.12 branch/enterprise-4.13 branch/enterprise-4.14 branch/enterprise-4.15 branch/enterprise-4.16 jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants