OCPBUGS-37699: Remove mode=6 balance-alb from networking docs#79684
OCPBUGS-37699: Remove mode=6 balance-alb from networking docs#79684sheriff-rh merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
Conversation
|
@dfitzmau: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-37699, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
| @@ -15,8 +15,6 @@ to the cluster. | |||
| * mode=1 active-backup + | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Article https://access.redhat.com/solutions/67546 mentions that mode 1 is partially working..do I need to call out what might happen on using this mode?
|
Hi @dfitzmau could you also help to update the bond mode in this example? It uses balance-rr, which is also not in the supported list: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.15/networking/k8s_nmstate/k8s-nmstate-updating-node-network-config.html#virt-example-nmstate-multiple-interfaces_k8s_nmstate-updating-node-network-config |
|
/lgtm It might be helpful to also mention supported bond modes in the day 1 docs: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.16/installing/installing_bare_metal_ipi/ipi-install-installation-workflow.html#configuring-host-dual-network-interfaces-in-the-install-config-yaml-file_ipi-install-installation-workflow Right now it's more important to pick the right mode at install time than in an NNCP since the NNCP can't apply to the primary interface anyway. |
|
@dfitzmau: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/label peer-review-needed |
|
/lgtm |
...es/ipi-install-configuring-host-dual-network-interfaces-in-the-install-config.yaml-file.adoc
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sheriff-rh
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changes LGTM; merging.
|
@dfitzmau: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-37699 is in an unrecognized state (Verified) and will not be moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.13 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.12 |
|
@sheriff-rh: new pull request created: #79973 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@sheriff-rh: new pull request created: #79974 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@sheriff-rh: new pull request created: #79975 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@sheriff-rh: new pull request created: #79977 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@sheriff-rh: new pull request created: #79978 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@sheriff-rh: #79684 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.12": DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
Looks like a manual cherrypick for 4.12 @dfitzmau |
Version(s):
4.12+
Issue:
OCPBUGS-37699
Link to docs preview:
Example: Bond interface node network configuration policy