Skip to content

OSDOCS-11170: Adding workload partitioning notes in microshift releas…#80281

Merged
Srivaralakshmi merged 1 commit intoopenshift:enterprise-4.17from
aravipra:OSDOCS-11170
Aug 27, 2024
Merged

OSDOCS-11170: Adding workload partitioning notes in microshift releas…#80281
Srivaralakshmi merged 1 commit intoopenshift:enterprise-4.17from
aravipra:OSDOCS-11170

Conversation

@aravipra
Copy link
Contributor

@aravipra aravipra commented Aug 9, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Version(s):
4.17

Issue:
OSDOCS-11170

Link to docs preview:
workload partitioning

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

SME review:

  • SME has approved this change.

Additional Information:
related to #80198

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Aug 9, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 9, 2024 •
edited by openshift-ci bot
Loading

@aravipra: This pull request references OSDOCS-11170 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.17

Issue:
OSDOCS-11170

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

SME review:

  • SME has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 9, 2024
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Aug 9, 2024 •
edited
Loading

🤖 Mon Aug 26 15:13:10 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://80281--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_release_notes/microshift-4-17-release-notes.html

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 9, 2024 •
edited by openshift-ci bot
Loading

@aravipra: This pull request references OSDOCS-11170 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.17

Issue:
OSDOCS-11170

Link to docs preview:
workload partitioning

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

SME review:

  • SME has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@aravipra
Copy link
Contributor Author

aravipra commented Aug 9, 2024

WIP donot close

@eslutsky
Copy link

eslutsky commented Aug 19, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 19, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 19, 2024 •
edited by openshift-ci bot
Loading

@aravipra: This pull request references OSDOCS-11170 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.17

Issue:
OSDOCS-11170

Link to docs preview:
workload partitioning

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

SME review:

  • SME has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz added this to the Planned for 4.17 GA milestone Aug 20, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 26, 2024

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 26, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 26, 2024 •
edited by openshift-ci bot
Loading

@aravipra: This pull request references OSDOCS-11170 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.17

Issue:
OSDOCS-11170

Link to docs preview:
workload partitioning

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

SME review:

  • SME has approved this change.

Additional Information:
related to #80198

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 26, 2024

@aravipra: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@dhensel-rh
Copy link

dhensel-rh commented Aug 26, 2024

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Aug 26, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 26, 2024 •
edited by openshift-ci bot
Loading

@aravipra: This pull request references OSDOCS-11170 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.17

Issue:
OSDOCS-11170

Link to docs preview:
workload partitioning

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

SME review:

  • SME has approved this change.

Additional Information:
related to #80198

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 26, 2024 •
edited by openshift-ci bot
Loading

@aravipra: This pull request references OSDOCS-11170 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.17

Issue:
OSDOCS-11170

Link to docs preview:
workload partitioning

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

SME review:

  • SME has approved this change.

Additional Information:
related to #80198

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@aravipra
Copy link
Contributor Author

aravipra commented Aug 26, 2024

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Aug 26, 2024
@Srivaralakshmi Srivaralakshmi added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR sme-review-done Service Delivery issues that have been reviewed by SRE, PMs, Engineering, QE, etc. and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Aug 27, 2024
@Srivaralakshmi Srivaralakshmi added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. branch/enterprise-4.17 labels Aug 27, 2024
Srivaralakshmi
Srivaralakshmi reviewed Aug 27, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@Srivaralakshmi Srivaralakshmi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aravipra Nice work! LGTM.

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor

dfitzmau commented Aug 27, 2024

/remove-label peer-review-needed

/label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Aug 27, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 27, 2024

@dfitzmau: Those labels are not set on the issue: peer-review-needed

Details

In response to this:

/remove-label peer-review-needed

/label peer-review-in-progress

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

dfitzmau
dfitzmau approved these changes Aug 27, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@dfitzmau dfitzmau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/remove-label peer-review-in-progress

/label peer-review-done

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Aug 27, 2024
@aravipra
Copy link
Contributor Author

aravipra commented Aug 27, 2024

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Aug 27, 2024
@Srivaralakshmi Srivaralakshmi added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Aug 27, 2024
@Srivaralakshmi Srivaralakshmi merged commit ca929c6 into openshift:enterprise-4.17 Aug 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@dfitzmau dfitzmau dfitzmau approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@Srivaralakshmi Srivaralakshmi Srivaralakshmi left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@eslutsky eslutsky

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.17 jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. sme-review-done Service Delivery issues that have been reviewed by SRE, PMs, Engineering, QE, etc.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

OCP 4.17 GA

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@aravipra @openshift-ci-robot @ocpdocs-previewbot @eslutsky @dhensel-rh @dfitzmau @Srivaralakshmi @ShaunaDiaz