Skip to content

#CNV-38162: new inferfromvolume content#80363

Merged
jeana-redhat merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
sabrinajess:CNV31862
Sep 26, 2024
Merged

#CNV-38162: new inferfromvolume content#80363
jeana-redhat merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
sabrinajess:CNV31862

Conversation

@sabrinajess
Copy link
Contributor

@sabrinajess sabrinajess commented Aug 12, 2024

Version(s): 4.16+

Issue: CNV-31862

Link to docs preview: https://80363--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/virt/virtual_machines/virt-specifying-instance-preference.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Aug 12, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 12, 2024

@sabrinajess: This pull request references CNV-38162 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.16+

Issue: CNV-31862

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@sabrinajess sabrinajess changed the title #CNV-38162: new inferfromvolume content [WIP] #CNV-38162: new inferfromvolume content Aug 12, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 12, 2024

@sabrinajess: This pull request references CNV-38162 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.16+

Issue: CNV-31862

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 12, 2024
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Aug 12, 2024

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 12, 2024

@sabrinajess: This pull request references CNV-38162 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.16+

Issue: CNV-31862

Link to docs preview: https://80363--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/virt/virtual_machines/virt-specifying-instance-preference.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@sabrinajess sabrinajess force-pushed the CNV31862 branch 2 times, most recently from 0a6eff5 to ce1e194 Compare August 16, 2024 18:23
Copy link

@0xFelix 0xFelix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/cc @lyarwood

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from lyarwood August 19, 2024 06:58
@sabrinajess sabrinajess force-pushed the CNV31862 branch 3 times, most recently from 8a7fe8f to aba8496 Compare August 19, 2024 17:50
@sabrinajess sabrinajess force-pushed the CNV31862 branch 2 times, most recently from 6c2e0b0 to 66eeea9 Compare September 3, 2024 21:10
@sabrinajess sabrinajess changed the title [WIP] #CNV-38162: new inferfromvolume content #CNV-38162: new inferfromvolume content Sep 4, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 4, 2024
Copy link

@0xFelix 0xFelix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@abhatt-rh abhatt-rh added branch/enterprise-4.16 branch/enterprise-4.17 and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Sep 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@abhatt-rh abhatt-rh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @sabrinajess,
Mostly LGTM! I have added a couple of comments related to style guidance and recommendation for rewording a few sentences for your consideration. Thank you!

@abhatt-rh
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
/remove-label peer-review-needed
/label peer-review-done

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Sep 10, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 10, 2024

@abhatt-rh: Those labels are not set on the issue: peer-review-in-progress

Details

In response to this:

/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
/remove-label peer-review-needed
/label peer-review-done

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 26, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 26, 2024

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@sabrinajess
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Sep 26, 2024
@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat added the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Sep 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One format nit that should be addressed. Also suggest removing the use of "both" in a couple places while you're in here.

Otherwise, looking stellar 😎

/remove-label merge-review-in-progress
/remove-label merge-review-needed

[id="virt-using-flags-specify_{context}"]
= Using flags to specify instance types and preferences

Specify both instance types and preferences by using flags.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Specify both instance types and preferences by using flags.
Specify instance types and preferences by using flags.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Sep 26, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 26, 2024

@sabrinajess: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat merged commit 9a11af2 into openshift:main Sep 26, 2024
@jeana-redhat
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

@jeana-redhat
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jeana-redhat: new pull request created: #82609

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jeana-redhat: new pull request created: #82610

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.16 branch/enterprise-4.17 jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants