OCPBUGS#38094: Correcting the image name for cluster node tuning operator#89235
OCPBUGS#38094: Correcting the image name for cluster node tuning operator#89235abhatt-rh merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
Conversation
|
@abhatt-rh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-38094, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@abhatt-rh: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/retest |
|
🤖 Wed Feb 26 19:13:13 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: |
|
@abhatt-rh: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
Hi @kononovn, Can you please review and approve this PR or direct me to someone who can? Thank you! |
|
/lgtm |
|
@dgonyier: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14 |
|
@abhatt-rh: new pull request created: #89891 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@abhatt-rh: new pull request created: #89892 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@abhatt-rh: new pull request created: #89893 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@abhatt-rh: new pull request created: #89894 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@abhatt-rh: new pull request created: #89895 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@abhatt-rh: new pull request created: #89896 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
OCPBUGS#38094: Correcting the image name for cluster node tuning operator in one of the procedures
Version(s):
4.14+
Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-38094
Link to docs preview:
https://89235--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/cnf-tuning-low-latency-nodes-with-perf-profile.html#cnf-configuring-power-saving-for-nodes_cnf-low-latency-perf-profile
QE review: