Skip to content

OCPBUGS#38094: Correcting the image name for cluster node tuning operator#89235

Merged
abhatt-rh merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
abhatt-rh:ocpb-38094
Mar 7, 2025
Merged

OCPBUGS#38094: Correcting the image name for cluster node tuning operator#89235
abhatt-rh merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
abhatt-rh:ocpb-38094

Conversation

@abhatt-rh
Copy link
Contributor

@abhatt-rh abhatt-rh commented Feb 26, 2025

OCPBUGS#38094: Correcting the image name for cluster node tuning operator in one of the procedures

Version(s):
4.14+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-38094

Link to docs preview:
https://89235--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/cnf-tuning-low-latency-nodes-with-perf-profile.html#cnf-configuring-power-saving-for-nodes_cnf-low-latency-perf-profile

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 26, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@abhatt-rh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-38094, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

OCPBUGS#38094: Correcting the image name for cluster node tuning operator in one of the procedures

Version(s):
4.14+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-38094

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@abhatt-rh abhatt-rh changed the title OCPBUGS-38094: Correcting the image name for cluster node tuning operator OCPBUGS#38094: Correcting the image name for cluster node tuning operator Feb 26, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 26, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@abhatt-rh: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a jira issue, add 'XYZ-NNN:' to the title of this pull request and request another refresh with /jira refresh.

Details

In response to this:

OCPBUGS#38094: Correcting the image name for cluster node tuning operator in one of the procedures

Version(s):
4.14+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-38094

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@abhatt-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 26, 2025

@abhatt-rh: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@abhatt-rh abhatt-rh added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Mar 3, 2025
@xenolinux xenolinux added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Mar 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@xenolinux xenolinux left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@xenolinux xenolinux added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Mar 3, 2025
@abhatt-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @kononovn, Can you please review and approve this PR or direct me to someone who can? Thank you!

@dgonyier
Copy link

dgonyier commented Mar 7, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 7, 2025

@dgonyier: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

Details

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@abhatt-rh abhatt-rh merged commit 05b0a82 into openshift:main Mar 7, 2025
2 checks passed
@abhatt-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

@abhatt-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

@abhatt-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

@abhatt-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

@abhatt-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

@abhatt-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@abhatt-rh: new pull request created: #89891

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@abhatt-rh: new pull request created: #89892

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@abhatt-rh: new pull request created: #89893

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@abhatt-rh: new pull request created: #89894

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@abhatt-rh: new pull request created: #89895

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@abhatt-rh: new pull request created: #89896

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants