Skip to content

OSDOCS#13788: Added info for cache and workspace directories in oc-mirror doc#97093

Merged
dfitzmau merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
sr1kar99:13788-dir
Aug 6, 2025
Merged

OSDOCS#13788: Added info for cache and workspace directories in oc-mirror doc#97093
dfitzmau merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
sr1kar99:13788-dir

Conversation

@sr1kar99
Copy link
Contributor

@sr1kar99 sr1kar99 commented Aug 5, 2025

Version(s):
4.19+

Issue:
OSDOCS-13788

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 5, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Aug 5, 2025

@sr1kar99 sr1kar99 force-pushed the 13788-dir branch 2 times, most recently from a83cb1b to 4b0851b Compare August 5, 2025 08:29
@sr1kar99
Copy link
Contributor Author

sr1kar99 commented Aug 5, 2025

@nidangavali
Could you please review this PR?
Thanks!

@nidangavali
Copy link

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Aug 5, 2025
@sr1kar99 sr1kar99 force-pushed the 13788-dir branch 2 times, most recently from 7ab8f43 to 42d37c2 Compare August 5, 2025 16:28
@lmzuccarelli
Copy link

@sr1kar99 - let me know when you have updated according to your suggestion in our slack conversation

@lmzuccarelli
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 6, 2025
@sr1kar99
Copy link
Contributor Author

sr1kar99 commented Aug 6, 2025

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Aug 6, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 6, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 6, 2025

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@dfitzmau dfitzmau added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR branch/enterprise-4.19 branch/enterprise-4.20 and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Aug 6, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 6, 2025

@sr1kar99: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@dfitzmau dfitzmau merged commit 649c738 into openshift:main Aug 6, 2025
2 checks passed
@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor

dfitzmau commented Aug 6, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor

dfitzmau commented Aug 6, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

@dfitzmau dfitzmau removed the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Aug 6, 2025
@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #97251

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #97252

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.19 branch/enterprise-4.20 qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants