OSDOCS#15857: Change *OperatorHub* to *Software Catalog* &tc. by michaelryanpeter · Pull Request #99436 · openshift/openshift-docs

michaelryanpeter · 2025-09-19T19:17:57Z

Version(s): 4.20

QE review:

QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

ocpdocs-previewbot · 2025-09-19T19:26:53Z

🤖 Mon Oct 06 20:42:39 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://99436--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

modules/gitops-release-notes-1-3-2.adoc

modules/kmm-hub-running-kmm-on-the-spoke.adoc

modules/lvms-installing-logical-volume-manager-operator-using-openshift-web-console.adoc

modules/nw-external-dns-operator.adoc

modules/optional-capabilities-operators.adoc

microshift_running_apps/microshift_operators/microshift-operators-olm.adoc

bergerhoffer

LGTM for descheduler and secondary scheduler files

TheRealJon

Just a couple of small nits

architecture/control-plane.adoc

disconnected/updating/disconnected-update.adoc

modules/psap-driver-toolkit.adoc

michaelryanpeter · 2025-10-03T19:40:14Z

~~@yapei` PTAL~~

Update: Bruno from the Operator Framework QA team reviewed the PR. Thank you!

bandrade · 2025-10-06T16:21:13Z

/lgtm
/label qe-approved
/verified by @bandrade

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-10-06T16:21:26Z

@bandrade: This PR has been marked as verified by @bandrade.

Details

In response to this:

/lgtm
/label qe-approved
/verified by @bandrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

michaelryanpeter · 2025-10-06T16:46:15Z

/hold I will merge

michaelryanpeter · 2025-10-06T16:47:58Z

/label peer-review-needed

openshift-ci · 2025-10-06T16:48:02Z

@michaelryanpeter: The label(s) /label peer-review-needed cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, ux-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, run-integration-tests, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, cloud-experts, cnv, dev-tools, distributed-tracing, ims, jira/valid-bug, merge-review-in-progress, merge-review-needed, mtc, multi-arch, oadp, ok-to-test, rhacs, rhv, sd-docs, serverless, service-mesh, sme-review-done, sme-review-needed, stability-fix-approved, staff-eng-approved, telco. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

Details

In response to this:

/label peer-review-needed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

bscott-rh

LGTM, nice work.

modules/disabling-catalogsource-objects.adoc

modules/olm-restricted-networks-configuring-operatorhub.adoc

openshift-ci · 2025-10-06T19:48:42Z

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

michaelryanpeter · 2025-10-06T20:23:58Z

/retest

openshift-ci · 2025-10-06T20:48:12Z

@michaelryanpeter: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

AedinC · 2025-10-07T10:22:24Z

Thanks for this @michaelryanpeter. Looks good for the Managed OpenShift docs.

michaelryanpeter · 2025-10-07T15:11:45Z

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2025-10-07T15:12:32Z

@michaelryanpeter: Failed to get PR patch from GitHub. This PR will need to be manually cherrypicked.

Error message

status code 406 not one of [200], body: {"message":"Sorry, the diff exceeded the maximum number of files (300). Consider using 'List pull requests files' API or locally cloning the repository instead.","errors":[{"resource":"PullRequest","field":"diff","code":"too_large"}],"documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/pulls#list-pull-requests-files","status":"406"}

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

michaelryanpeter added this to the Planned for 4.20 GA milestone Sep 19, 2025

michaelryanpeter added the branch/enterprise-4.20 label Sep 19, 2025

openshift-ci bot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 19, 2025