Skip to content

Conversation

@snarayan-redhat
Copy link
Contributor

Version(s): 4.16+

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-16256

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change. - NA

Additional information:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 7, 2025
@snarayan-redhat snarayan-redhat force-pushed the OSDOCS-16256_unusedmodules branch from 0053f90 to f762369 Compare October 7, 2025 05:51
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 7, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

🤖 Tue Oct 07 05:56:50 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://100084--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 7, 2025

@snarayan-redhat: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@snarayan-redhat snarayan-redhat added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Oct 7, 2025
@xenolinux xenolinux added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Oct 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@xenolinux xenolinux left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@xenolinux xenolinux added this to the Continuous Release milestone Oct 7, 2025
@xenolinux xenolinux removed the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Oct 7, 2025
@xenolinux xenolinux merged commit b818e1b into openshift:main Oct 7, 2025
2 checks passed
@xenolinux
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

@xenolinux
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

@xenolinux
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

@xenolinux
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@xenolinux: new pull request created: #100089

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@xenolinux
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@xenolinux: new pull request created: #100090

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@xenolinux: new pull request created: #100091

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@xenolinux: new pull request created: #100092

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@xenolinux: new pull request created: #100093

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants