Skip to content

Conversation

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Oct 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 8, 2025

@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-13908 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16+

Issue:
OSDOCS-13908

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • N/A doc restructuring for AEM migration

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz force-pushed the OSDOCS-13908 branch 3 times, most recently from 9b959d9 to fb0c901 Compare October 8, 2025 18:14
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 8, 2025

@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-13908 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target only the "4.21.0" version, but multiple target versions were set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16+

Issue:
OSDOCS-13908

Link to docs preview:

QE review:
N/A doc restructuring for AEM migration

Additional info:
Also tests blank line insertion in assemblies for functionality

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 9, 2025

@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-13908 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target only the "4.21.0" version, but multiple target versions were set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16+

Issue:
OSDOCS-13908

Link to docs preview:
https://100209--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_troubleshooting/microshift-installing-troubleshooting.html
https://100209--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_updating/microshift-list-update-contents.html
https://100209--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_updating/microshift-update-options.html
https://100209--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_updating/microshift-update-rhel-edge-to-image-mode.html
https://100209--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_updating/microshift-update-rpms-manually.html
https://100209--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_updating/microshift-update-rpms-ostree.html
https://100209--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_welcome/index.html

QE review:
N/A doc restructuring for AEM migration

Additional info:
Also tests blank line insertion in assemblies for functionality

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz force-pushed the OSDOCS-13908 branch 2 times, most recently from 41ca682 to 805e955 Compare October 9, 2025 18:49
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 9, 2025

@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-13908 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target only the "4.21.0" version, but multiple target versions were set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16+

Issue:
OSDOCS-13908

Link to docs preview:
https://100209--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_troubleshooting/microshift-installing-troubleshooting.html
https://100209--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_updating/microshift-list-update-contents.html
https://100209--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_updating/microshift-update-options.html
https://100209--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_updating/microshift-update-rhel-edge-to-image-mode.html
https://100209--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_updating/microshift-update-rpms-manually.html
https://100209--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_updating/microshift-update-rpms-ostree.html
https://100209--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_welcome/index.html

QE review:
N/A doc restructuring for AEM migration

Additional info:
Also tests blank line insertion in assemblies for functionality and adds short descriptions.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 10, 2025

@ShaunaDiaz: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Oct 13, 2025
@bscott-rh bscott-rh added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Oct 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@bscott-rh bscott-rh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Merge review LGTM.

@bscott-rh bscott-rh added ok-to-merge and removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR labels Oct 13, 2025
@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz merged commit 58d51a1 into openshift:main Oct 13, 2025
2 checks passed
@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

This comment was marked as resolved.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.16 branch/enterprise-4.17 branch/enterprise-4.18 branch/enterprise-4.19 branch/enterprise-4.20 jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. ok-to-merge size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants