Skip to content

Conversation

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz commented Oct 14, 2025

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Oct 14, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 14, 2025

@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-15650 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16+ (manual CPs 4.18 and back; not all features exist in every branch)

Issue:
OSDOCS-15650

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • N/A no technical updates

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz added this to the Continuous Release milestone Oct 14, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 14, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Oct 14, 2025

🤖 Wed Oct 15 12:03:58 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://100487--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Oct 14, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 14, 2025

@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-15650 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target either version "4.21." or "openshift-4.21.", but it targets "openshift-4.20.z" instead.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16+ (manual CPs 4.18 and back; not all features exist in every branch)

Issue:
OSDOCS-15650

Link to docs preview:
https://100487--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_install_rpm_opt/microshift-install-optional-rpms.html

QE review:

  • N/A no technical updates

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 14, 2025

@ShaunaDiaz: This pull request references OSDOCS-15650 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target either version "4.21." or "openshift-4.21.", but it targets "openshift-4.20.z" instead.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.16+ (manual CPs 4.18 and back; not all features exist in every branch)

Issue:
OSDOCS-15650

Link to docs preview:
https://100487--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_install_rpm_opt/microshift-install-optional-rpms.html
https://100487--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_running_apps/microshift-observability-service#microshift-observability-service

QE review:

  • N/A no technical updates

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Oct 14, 2025
@mburke5678 mburke5678 added the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Oct 14, 2025
@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

@ShaunaDiaz A couple of nits and a question. The nits are technically not merge blockers (but should be!). Did you want to take a look before the merge?

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz force-pushed the OSDOCS-15650 branch 2 times, most recently from 95598ab to 9d802a4 Compare October 15, 2025 11:56
@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Oct 15, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 15, 2025

@ShaunaDiaz: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz merged commit 85f65a7 into openshift:main Oct 15, 2025
2 checks passed
@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #100519

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #100520

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.16 branch/enterprise-4.17 branch/enterprise-4.18 branch/enterprise-4.19 branch/enterprise-4.20 jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants