Skip to content

Conversation

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor

@dfitzmau dfitzmau commented Oct 16, 2025

Version(s):
4.20

Issue:
OSDOCS-13616

Link to docs preview:
Additional cluster latency requirements for etcd

  • SME has approved this change.
  • QE has approved this change.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 16, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Oct 16, 2025

@dfitzmau dfitzmau force-pushed the OSDOCS-13616-takeover branch from 7ea9792 to ef943eb Compare October 16, 2025 14:50
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 16, 2025
@dfitzmau dfitzmau force-pushed the OSDOCS-13616-takeover branch from ef943eb to 9517d08 Compare October 16, 2025 15:19
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 16, 2025

@dfitzmau: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.


To support a low-latency, high-availability network, especially during the leader election process, an arbiter site should be located where it provides an RTT latency of less than 10 ms. The arbiter component of a network maintains consistency and availability in a distributed system.

// Need to clarify so the impression is that the arbiter is not counted in the number of nodes
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These comments will be resolved in 4.20.z.

@dusk125
Copy link

dusk125 commented Oct 16, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 16, 2025
@geliu2016
Copy link

/lgtm

@dfitzmau dfitzmau added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Oct 17, 2025
@mburke5678 mburke5678 added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Oct 17, 2025
@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@mburke5678 mburke5678 merged commit 08ca269 into openshift:main Oct 17, 2025
2 checks passed
@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #100724

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.20 lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants