Skip to content

Conversation

@prithvipatil97
Copy link
Contributor

@prithvipatil97 prithvipatil97 commented Oct 29, 2025

Current Look:

  • Edit the ClusterLogForwarder CR in the openshift-logging project:
$ oc -n openshift-logging edit ClusterLogging instance  
  • This is a command referencing the ClusterLogging instance
  • But here we are editing the ClusterLogForwarder CR in the openshift-logging project.
  • Hence, it needs to be changed with ClusterLogForwarder or obsclf.

Updated Look:

  • Edit the ClusterLogForwarder CR in the openshift-logging project:
$ oc -n openshift-logging edit clusterlogforwarder.observability.openshift.io <clf_name>  

This is the correct format.

Version(s):

Logging 6.4, Logging 6.3, Logging 6.2, Logging 6.1, Logging 6.0

Issue:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-2667

Link to docs preview:

https://101296--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/
https://101296--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-logging/latest/configuring/cluster-logging-collector.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Wrong command in logging 6 documentation
Here is the documentation link:
 https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_openshift_logging/6.3/html/configuring_logging/cluster-logging-collector#cluster-logging-collector-limits_cluster-logging-collector 
Current Look:

Edit the ClusterLogForwarder CR in the openshift-logging project:
$ oc -n openshift-logging edit ClusterLogging instance 
This is a command referencing the `ClusterLogging` instance
But here we are editing the ClusterLogForwarder CR in the openshift-logging project.
Hence, it needs to be changed with ClusterLogForwarder or obsclf.
Updated Look:

Edit the ClusterLogForwarder CR in the openshift-logging project:
$ oc -n openshift-logging edit clusterlogforwarder.observability.openshift.io <clf_name> 
This is the correct format.
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 29, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 29, 2025

@prithvipatil97: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@prithvipatil97
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello Team,
I need QE approval for this change.

All checks have passed, and I have reviewed the PR with the peer review checklist.

@anpingli , @QiaolingTang , it would be really helpful if someone could please take a look and provide QE approval for this change.

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Prithviraj Patil

@anpingli
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 29, 2025
@prithvipatil97
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello anpingli,
Thank you very much for providing the QE approval for this change.

Regards,
Prithviraj Patil

@prithvipatil97
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Oct 29, 2025
@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR labels Oct 29, 2025
@briandooley briandooley merged commit eaf836d into openshift:standalone-logging-docs-main Nov 10, 2025
2 checks passed
@briandooley
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick standalone-logging-docs-6.0

@briandooley
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick standalone-logging-docs-6.1

@briandooley
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick standalone-logging-docs-6.2

@briandooley
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick standalone-logging-docs-6.3

@briandooley
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick standalone-logging-docs-6.4

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@briandooley: new pull request created: #102109

In response to this:

/cherrypick standalone-logging-docs-6.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@briandooley: new pull request created: #102110

In response to this:

/cherrypick standalone-logging-docs-6.1

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@briandooley: new pull request created: #102111

In response to this:

/cherrypick standalone-logging-docs-6.2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@briandooley: new pull request created: #102112

In response to this:

/cherrypick standalone-logging-docs-6.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@briandooley: new pull request created: #102113

In response to this:

/cherrypick standalone-logging-docs-6.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants