-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
OSDOCS CMA 2.17.2-2 Release Notes #101309
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OSDOCS CMA 2.17.2-2 Release Notes #101309
Conversation
c9a266e to
56acefb
Compare
56acefb to
4bacc61
Compare
| @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ | |||
| // Module included in the following assemblies: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PEER REVIEW: No change to text. Copied from the release note assembly to a new module and bumped up the heading levels. No change to the text.
9a1d6f2 to
4a7d0f3
Compare
jeana-redhat
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One thing I wasn't sure whether it was a typo or not, LGTM
/remove-label merge-review-in-progress
/remove-label merge-review-needed
|
|
||
| Issued: 21 October 2025 | ||
|
|
||
| This release of the Custom Metrics Autoscaler Operator 2.17.2-2 is a rebuild of the 2.17.2 version of the Custom Metrics Autoscaler Operator using a newer base image and Go compiler. There are no code changes to the Custom Metrics Operator. The following advisory is available for the Custom Metrics Autoscaler Operator: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
typo, or are there two Operators with similar names?
| This release of the Custom Metrics Autoscaler Operator 2.17.2-2 is a rebuild of the 2.17.2 version of the Custom Metrics Autoscaler Operator using a newer base image and Go compiler. There are no code changes to the Custom Metrics Operator. The following advisory is available for the Custom Metrics Autoscaler Operator: | |
| This release of the Custom Metrics Autoscaler Operator 2.17.2-2 is a rebuild of the 2.17.2 version of the Custom Metrics Autoscaler Operator using a newer base image and Go compiler. There are no code changes to the Custom Metrics Autoscaler Operator. The following advisory is available for the Custom Metrics Autoscaler Operator: |
| The Cluster Metrics Autoscaler Operator now supports bound service account tokens. Previously, the Operator supported only legacy service account tokens, which are being phased out in favor of bound service account tokens for security reasons. | ||
|
|
||
| [id="nodes-pods-autoscaling-custom-rn-2172-bugs_{context}"] | ||
| == Bug fixes |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We stopped adding bold to the bug links in the core RNs (because of docs.redhat.com styling), idk if you want to do the same here or not
4a7d0f3 to
4dae6a3
Compare
|
@mburke5678: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.12 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.13 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.21 |
|
@mburke5678: #101309 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.12": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@mburke5678: #101309 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.13": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@mburke5678: #101309 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.14": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@mburke5678: #101309 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.15": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@mburke5678: #101309 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.16": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@mburke5678: #101309 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.17": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@mburke5678: #101309 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.18": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@mburke5678: #101309 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.19": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@mburke5678: new pull request created: #101370 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@mburke5678: new pull request created: #101371 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-16900
Link to docs preview:
CMA RN -> Supported versions -- Updated version table.
CMA RN -> Custom Metrics Autoscaler Operator 2.17.2-2 release notes -- New module, text based on the text in the errata.
CMA Past Releases -> Custom Metrics Autoscaler Operator 2.17.2 release notes -- Moved from release notes to a new module in the past release notes assembly. Updated heading levels. NO CHANGES TO THE TEXT. No need to review.
CMA Past Releases -> Custom Metrics Autoscaler Operator 2.15.1-4 release notes -- Updated the mod-docs-content-type. No real preview.