Skip to content

Conversation

@snarayan-redhat
Copy link
Contributor

@snarayan-redhat snarayan-redhat commented Oct 30, 2025

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 30, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Oct 30, 2025

@bharath-b-rh
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 30, 2025
Copy link
Member

@lunarwhite lunarwhite left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@snarayan-redhat snarayan-redhat force-pushed the OSDOCS-16983_overridereplicas branch from 0ec2fde to 4eebde5 Compare November 3, 2025 08:22
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 3, 2025
@lunarwhite
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 3, 2025
@snarayan-redhat snarayan-redhat marked this pull request as draft November 3, 2025 17:27
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 3, 2025
@snarayan-redhat snarayan-redhat added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Nov 3, 2025
@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor

/label merge-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Nov 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some out of scope things, but for merge review LGTM

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer added ok-to-merge and removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Nov 3, 2025
@snarayan-redhat snarayan-redhat force-pushed the OSDOCS-16983_overridereplicas branch from 4eebde5 to 518fda8 Compare November 4, 2025 05:29
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 4, 2025

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 12, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 12, 2025

@snarayan-redhat: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@snarayan-redhat snarayan-redhat merged commit a459244 into openshift:main Nov 12, 2025
2 checks passed
@snarayan-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.21
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@snarayan-redhat: new pull request created: #102339

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.21
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@snarayan-redhat: new pull request created: #102340

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.21
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@snarayan-redhat: new pull request created: #102341

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.21
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@snarayan-redhat: new pull request created: #102342

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.21
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@snarayan-redhat: new pull request created: #102343

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.21
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants