Skip to content

Conversation

@AedinC
Copy link
Contributor

@AedinC AedinC commented Oct 30, 2025

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Oct 30, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 30, 2025

@AedinC: This pull request references OSDOCS-16538 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.20+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-16538

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 30, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 30, 2025

@AedinC: This pull request references OSDOCS-16538 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.20+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-16538

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

+
[NOTE]
====
Channel group options include *Stable* (default option) and *EUS*. For more information about the Stable and EUS channel group options, see link:https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/openshift_container_platform/4.19/html/updating_clusters/understanding-openshift-updates-1#understanding-update-channels-releases[Understanding update channels and releases].

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are we ok with linking 4.19 docs here vs 4.20 or latest? Just to ensure we align with what we usually to do

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missed that - will update now!

@andreadecorte
Copy link

lgtm

@abhgupta
Copy link
Member

@AedinC Both the preview links focus on cluster creation. How about day-2 operation for changing the channel group in the UI for an existing cluster?

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 31, 2025

@AedinC: This pull request references OSDOCS-16538 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.20+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-16538

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

+
[NOTE]
====
Channel group options include *Stable* (default option) and *EUS*. For more information about the Stable and EUS channel group options, see link:https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/openshift_container_platform/4.20/html/updating_clusters/understanding-openshift-updates-1#understanding-update-channels-releases[Understanding update channels and releases].
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the link URL, I would use latest instead of the actual version number. This will automatically redirect to the latest version (which is 4.20). That way you don't have to update this link every time a new version of OpenShift is released.

A couple optional suggestions:

  • For the link text, specify that the link goes to the OCP documentation since we're sending the reader to a different doc set.
  • Consider using a snippet for this note since it's repeated in a few different places.
Suggested change
Channel group options include *Stable* (default option) and *EUS*. For more information about the Stable and EUS channel group options, see link:https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/openshift_container_platform/4.20/html/updating_clusters/understanding-openshift-updates-1#understanding-update-channels-releases[Understanding update channels and releases].
Channel group options include *Stable* (default option) and *EUS*. For more information about the Stable and EUS channel group options, see link:https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/openshift_container_platform/latest/html/updating_clusters/understanding-openshift-updates-1#understanding-update-channels-releases[Understanding update channels and releases] in the OpenShift Container Platform documentation.

Copy link
Contributor

@bhardesty bhardesty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! I just had a couple small suggestions.

@AedinC
Copy link
Contributor Author

AedinC commented Oct 31, 2025

Looks good! I just had a couple small suggestions.

Thanks @bhardesty!

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 31, 2025

@AedinC: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 31, 2025

@AedinC: This pull request references OSDOCS-16538 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.20+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-16538

Link to docs preview:

Peer review:

  • Peer reviewer has approved this change.

SME review:

  • SME has approved this change.

QE review:

  • QE approval is not required to merge this PR

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@EricPonvelle EricPonvelle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@EricPonvelle EricPonvelle merged commit 4321f6b into openshift:main Oct 31, 2025
2 checks passed
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 31, 2025
@EricPonvelle
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20
/cherrypick enterprise-4.21

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@EricPonvelle: new pull request created: #101517

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20
/cherrypick enterprise-4.21

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@EricPonvelle: new pull request created: #101518

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20
/cherrypick enterprise-4.21

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.20 branch/enterprise-4.21 jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants