Skip to content

OSDOCS-16122 - Adding missing content types to ROSA #101659

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2025
Merged

OSDOCS-16122 - Adding missing content types to ROSA #101659

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2025

Conversation

@otikhomi
Copy link
Contributor

@otikhomi otikhomi commented Nov 4, 2025

OSDOCS-16122: Adding missing content types to ROSA

Version(s):
4.20+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-16122

Link to docs preview:
N/A

QE review:
N/A

Additional information:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 4, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Nov 4, 2025 •
edited
Loading

🤖 Tue Nov 04 21:33:39 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://101659--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

@otikhomi otikhomi force-pushed the OSDOCS-16122-adding-missing-content-types-rosa branch from 44fbc8e to 776d8a4 Compare November 4, 2025 21:21
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 4, 2025

@otikhomi: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

jneczypor
jneczypor reviewed Nov 5, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@jneczypor jneczypor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Great job!

@jneczypor jneczypor merged commit 3b28183 into openshift:main Nov 5, 2025
2 checks passed
@jneczypor
Copy link
Contributor

jneczypor commented Nov 5, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20
/cherrypick enterprise-4.21

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 5, 2025

@jneczypor: new pull request created: #101826

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20
/cherrypick enterprise-4.21

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 5, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 5, 2025

@jneczypor: new pull request created: #101827

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20
/cherrypick enterprise-4.21

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 5, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jneczypor jneczypor jneczypor left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@otikhomi @ocpdocs-previewbot @jneczypor @openshift-cherrypick-robot