Skip to content

OSDOCS-15824 [NETOBSERV] Refactor release notes 1.3.0 #101949

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2025
Merged

OSDOCS-15824 [NETOBSERV] Refactor release notes 1.3.0 #101949

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2025

Conversation

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Contributor

@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan commented Nov 6, 2025 •
edited
Loading

OSDOCS-15824 [NETOBSERV] Refactor release notes 1.3.0

Version(s):
4.12, 4.14+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15824

Link to docs preview:

QE review:
QE is not required for this PR. This PR modularizes Network Observability Operator release notes for 1.3.0 only. There are no content changes.

Additional information:

  • xrefs are being moved to the "Additional resources" section to comply with no xrefs in modules.
  • The Network Observability Operator release notes are being modularized through a series of PRs. This means that things will get cleaned up and consolidated along the way.
  • Some of these PRs may contain updates to previously merged content for the purpose of consistency.
  • The network-observability-release-notes.adoc file will dwindle with each PR while the network-observability-operator-release-notes-archive.adoc file will grow.
  • In as many cases as possible, such as:
    [id="network-observability-channel-deprecation"]
    == Channel deprecation
    existing ID in network-observability-release-notes.adoc has been used in the new module.
  • Since not all content applies to every OCP branch, it is possible there will be cherry-pick failures. This will likely apply to release notes since it has been 1 assembly file and not all content is applicable to all OCP branches.
  • I will manually verify content on each breach, and create manual cherry-picks accordingly.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 6, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 6, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 6, 2025
@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Nov 6, 2025

Rebased 11/06/2025 AM

Picked up #97627 and #97600

@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Nov 6, 2025 •
edited
Loading

🤖 Fri Nov 07 14:28:04 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://101949--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/network_observability/network-observability-operator-release-notes.html
https://101949--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/network_observability/release_notes_archive/network-observability-operator-release-notes-archive.html

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 6, 2025
@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan force-pushed the OSDOCS-15824 branch 2 times, most recently from 7cff6d4 to 73969b4 Compare November 6, 2025 21:14
@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Nov 6, 2025

Rebased 11/06/2025 PM.

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Nov 6, 2025

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Nov 6, 2025
ShaunaDiaz
ShaunaDiaz reviewed Nov 7, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One error that needs fixed. Otherwise LGTM

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz removed the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Nov 7, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 7, 2025

@gwynnemonahan: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

ShaunaDiaz
ShaunaDiaz reviewed Nov 7, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

ShaunaDiaz commented Nov 7, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

ShaunaDiaz commented Nov 7, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

ShaunaDiaz commented Nov 7, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

ShaunaDiaz commented Nov 7, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

ShaunaDiaz commented Nov 7, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

ShaunaDiaz commented Nov 7, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

ShaunaDiaz commented Nov 7, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

ShaunaDiaz commented Nov 7, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 7, 2025

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #102002

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 7, 2025

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #102003

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Merged
@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

ShaunaDiaz commented Nov 7, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.21

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 7, 2025

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #102004

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 7, 2025

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #102005

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 7, 2025

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #102006

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 7, 2025

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #102007

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 7, 2025

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #102008

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 7, 2025

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #102009

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.21

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Merged
@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Contributor

ShaunaDiaz commented Nov 7, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 7, 2025

@ShaunaDiaz: new pull request created: #102012

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz left review comments

+1 more reviewer

@ocpdocs-vale-bot ocpdocs-vale-bot ocpdocs-vale-bot left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.12 branch/enterprise-4.14 branch/enterprise-4.15 branch/enterprise-4.16 branch/enterprise-4.17 branch/enterprise-4.18 branch/enterprise-4.19 branch/enterprise-4.20 branch/enterprise-4.21 lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@gwynnemonahan @ocpdocs-previewbot @ShaunaDiaz @openshift-cherrypick-robot @ocpdocs-vale-bot @openshift-merge-robot