Skip to content

OSDOCS-15827 [NETOBSERV] Refactor release notes 1.6.0 #102310

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2025
Merged

OSDOCS-15827 [NETOBSERV] Refactor release notes 1.6.0 #102310

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2025

Conversation

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Contributor

@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan commented Nov 11, 2025 •
edited
Loading

#102252 must be merged first. Then rebase to capture 1.5.0.

OSDOCS-15827 [NETOBSERV] Refactor release notes 1.6.0

Version(s):
4.12, 4.14+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15827

Link to docs preview:

QE review:
QE is not required for this PR. This PR modularizes Network Observability Operator release notes for 1.3.0 only. There are no content changes.

Additional information:

  • For 1.6.0, xrefs are being left as they are, and are being commented out for now. Adding them to "Additional resources" creates a long list of links, which is not helpful. However, at this time, it is unclear what the alternative is or if there is going to be an exception for xrefs in release note modules.
  • The Network Observability Operator release notes are being modularized through a series of PRs. This means that things will get cleaned up and consolidated along the way.
  • Some of these PRs may contain updates to previously merged content for the purpose of consistency.
  • The network-observability-release-notes.adoc file will dwindle with each PR while the network-observability-operator-release-notes-archive.adoc file will grow.
    In as many cases as possible, such as:
    [id="network-observability-channel-removal-1.4_{context}"]
    == Channel removal
    existing ID in network-observability-release-notes.adoc has been used in the new module.
  • Since not all content applies to every OCP branch, it is possible there will be cherry-pick failures. This will likely apply to release notes since it has been 1 assembly file and not all content is applicable to all OCP branches.
  • I will manually verify content on each breach, and create manual cherry-picks accordingly.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 11, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Nov 11, 2025 •
edited
Loading

🤖 Thu Nov 13 13:40:46 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://102310--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/
https://102310--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/network_observability/release_notes_archive/network-observability-operator-release-notes-archive.html

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Nov 12, 2025

11/12/2025 AM: Rebased to capture 1.4.0, 1.4.1, 1.4.2 updates.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 12, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 12, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 12, 2025
@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan force-pushed the OSDOCS-15827 branch 2 times, most recently from 0feaeb2 to 4327fc6 Compare November 12, 2025 20:44
@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Nov 13, 2025

Rebased 11/13/2025 AM

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 13, 2025

@gwynnemonahan: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Nov 13, 2025

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Nov 13, 2025
@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2025
Merged
dfitzmau
dfitzmau reviewed Nov 13, 2025
View reviewed changes
modules/network-observability-operator-release-notes-1-6-0-fixed-issues.adoc
[role="_abstract"]
You can review the following fixed issues for the Network Observability Operator 1.6.0.

* Previously, a dead link to the OpenShift containter platform documentation was displayed in the Operator Lifecycle Manager (OLM) form for the `FlowMetrics` API creation. Now the link has been updated to point to a valid page. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NETOBSERV-1607[*NETOBSERV-1607*])
Copy link
Contributor

@dfitzmau dfitzmau Nov 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* Previously, a dead link to the OpenShift containter platform documentation was displayed in the Operator Lifecycle Manager (OLM) form for the `FlowMetrics` API creation. Now the link has been updated to point to a valid page. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NETOBSERV-1607[*NETOBSERV-1607*])
* Previously, a dead link to the OpenShift Containter Platform documentation was displayed in the Operator Lifecycle Manager (OLM) form for the `FlowMetrics` API creation. Now the link has been updated to point to a valid page. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NETOBSERV-1607[*NETOBSERV-1607*])

What about an attribute for OpenShift Containter Platform?

dfitzmau
dfitzmau reviewed Nov 13, 2025
View reviewed changes
modules/network-observability-operator-release-notes-1-6-0-fixed-issues.adoc
[role="_abstract"]
You can review the following fixed issues for the Network Observability Operator 1.6.0.

* Previously, a dead link to the OpenShift containter platform documentation was displayed in the Operator Lifecycle Manager (OLM) form for the `FlowMetrics` API creation. Now the link has been updated to point to a valid page. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NETOBSERV-1607[*NETOBSERV-1607*])
Copy link
Contributor

@dfitzmau dfitzmau Nov 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A recent internal decision was made to drop bolding the bug number: NETOBSERV-1544 > NETOBSERV-1544.

@dfitzmau dfitzmau merged commit d0c85c0 into openshift:main Nov 13, 2025
2 checks passed
@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor

dfitzmau commented Nov 13, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.21

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor

dfitzmau commented Nov 13, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor

dfitzmau commented Nov 13, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor

dfitzmau commented Nov 13, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor

dfitzmau commented Nov 13, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor

dfitzmau commented Nov 13, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor

dfitzmau commented Nov 13, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor

dfitzmau commented Nov 13, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

@dfitzmau
Copy link
Contributor

dfitzmau commented Nov 13, 2025

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 13, 2025

@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #102458

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.21

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 13, 2025

@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #102459

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

This was referenced Nov 13, 2025
Merged
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 13, 2025

@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #102460

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 13, 2025

@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #102461

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 13, 2025

@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #102462

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 13, 2025

@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #102463

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 13, 2025

@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #102464

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 13, 2025

@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #102465

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 13, 2025

@dfitzmau: new pull request created: #102466

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@dfitzmau dfitzmau dfitzmau left review comments

+1 more reviewer

@ocpdocs-vale-bot ocpdocs-vale-bot ocpdocs-vale-bot left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.12 branch/enterprise-4.14 branch/enterprise-4.15 branch/enterprise-4.16 branch/enterprise-4.17 branch/enterprise-4.18 branch/enterprise-4.19 branch/enterprise-4.20 branch/enterprise-4.21 merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@gwynnemonahan @ocpdocs-previewbot @dfitzmau @openshift-cherrypick-robot @ocpdocs-vale-bot @openshift-merge-robot