Skip to content

Conversation

rolfedh
Copy link
Contributor

@rolfedh rolfedh commented Sep 14, 2021

… notes

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 14, 2021
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 14, 2021

✔️ Deploy Preview for osdocs ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: 0a88c13

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/osdocs/deploys/614da8382aae1000080a7c7c

😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-36329--osdocs.netlify.app

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 14, 2021
Copy link

@periklis periklis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rolfedh rolfedh changed the title RHDEVDOCS-3295 Add a link to the OL 5.0.8 advisory to the 5.0 release… RHDEVDOCS-3295 Add a link to the OL 5.0.8 and 5.1.2 advisories to the 5.0 release… Sep 15, 2021
Copy link

@periklis periklis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks like missing the 5.1.2 changelog file?!

@rolfedh
Copy link
Contributor Author

rolfedh commented Sep 15, 2021

This looks like missing the 5.1.2 changelog file?!

Yes we're adding it right now.

@kabirbhartiRH
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 16, 2021
@kowen-rh
Copy link
Contributor

The wording of this PR looks good to me from a documentation perspective. Added a single comment questioning if we should include a copy of the "making open source more inclusive" section, as I believe this section is added automatically and including it in this PR could potentially result in a duplicate section (or, in case of updated wording in the snippet of origin, out of date information).

I'm leaving this review as a comment since I cannot independently confirm whether or not this change is explicitly required. Other than that section, this PR looks good to me! 👍

@Preeticp
Copy link
Contributor

@rolfedh apart from the one comment, looks good to me. Let me know when it is ready to be merged.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 24, 2021

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 24, 2021
@Preeticp Preeticp added branch/enterprise-4.7 dev-tools Label for all Odo/Pipelines/Helm/Developer Console/Perspective PRs lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR labels Sep 24, 2021
@Preeticp Preeticp merged commit 20d2e6a into openshift:enterprise-4.7 Sep 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.7 dev-tools Label for all Odo/Pipelines/Helm/Developer Console/Perspective PRs lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants