BZ2102828: Cu requires guidance on windows container Vs OCP windows node version compatibility and best dev practices to avoid compatibility issues.

[mburke5678]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102828

Preview: Windows pod placement: Important note

[mburke5678]

@rrasouli @jfrancoa PTAL

[jfrancoa]

In the original BZ there is a suggestion to point to the official Microsoft docs for more information:

Can I request that this be treated as a doc BZ and update our doc (below) to clarify that the container base image must match the windows version running on the OCP node and that the build number must match and as an additional data refer to Microsoft docs.

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/windowscontainers/deploy-containers/version-compatibility
, maybe you could add a reference to it in case more information is expected.

[mburke5678]

@jfrancoa Done!

http://file.rdu.redhat.com/mburke/BZ-2102828/windows_containers/scheduling-windows-workloads.html#windows-pod-placement_scheduling-windows-workloads

[mburke5678]

PEER REVIEW: The only change in this paragraph ^^ is the removal of a comma in the first line. No other changes.

[stevsmit]

I know it's beyond the scope of this PR since you just added a comma, but should we say ". . . by using a RuntimeClass object." in the first mention?

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Bots are busy building the preview. It will be available soon at:
https://49446--docspreview.netlify.app

Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/806

[stevsmit]

I know it's beyond the scope of this PR since you just added a comma, but should we say ". . . by using a RuntimeClass object." in the first mention?

[stevsmit]

Can "need to" be swapped to "must" ?

Based on IBMSG: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/ibm-style?topic=word-usage#need-to

[mburke5678]

@stevsmit Thanks! I caught that last-minute but neglected to push the change. Thank you for confirming the correction.

[stevsmit]

@mburke5678 PTAL.

[mburke5678]

Closing in favor of #50876