Skip to content

OSDOCS#1929 [RN] Discovering Operators from the CLI #57837

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 27, 2023
Merged

OSDOCS#1929 [RN] Discovering Operators from the CLI #57837

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 27, 2023

Conversation

michaelryanpeter
Copy link
Contributor

@michaelryanpeter michaelryanpeter commented Mar 27, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Version(s): 4.13 (release notes)

Issue: OSDOCS-1929

Link to docs preview: Finding Operator versions using the OpenShift CLI

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information: Release note for the procedure in #57833

@michaelryanpeter michaelryanpeter added this to the Planned for 4.13 GA milestone Mar 27, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 27, 2023
@michaelryanpeter michaelryanpeter mentioned this pull request Mar 27, 2023
Merged
1 task
@michaelryanpeter michaelryanpeter force-pushed the osdocs-1929-RN-operator-discoverability branch from 09bed39 to ea76d17 Compare March 27, 2023 22:28
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Mar 27, 2023 •
edited
Loading

🤖 Updated build preview is available at:
https://57837--docspreview.netlify.app

Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/15114

@michaelryanpeter michaelryanpeter force-pushed the osdocs-1929-RN-operator-discoverability branch from ea76d17 to 1660dc9 Compare March 31, 2023 18:51
@jianzhangbjz
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 14, 2023
@michaelryanpeter michaelryanpeter force-pushed the osdocs-1929-RN-operator-discoverability branch from 1660dc9 to 16da952 Compare April 25, 2023 16:15
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 25, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 25, 2023

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@michaelryanpeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Apr 25, 2023
@tmalove
Copy link
Contributor

tmalove commented Apr 25, 2023

/remove-label peer-review-needed
/label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Apr 25, 2023
@mburke5678 mburke5678 added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Apr 25, 2023
@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

@michaelryanpeter LGTM. The release notes might benefit from an explanation of what each example command does, without requiring the user to click the link. But, that is a minor nit.

@mburke5678 mburke5678 added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Apr 25, 2023
tmalove
tmalove reviewed Apr 25, 2023
View reviewed changes
@tmalove
Copy link
Contributor

tmalove commented Apr 25, 2023

/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
/label peer-review-done

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 25, 2023

@tmalove: Those labels are not set on the issue: peer-review-in-progress

In response to this:

/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
/label peer-review-done

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@michaelryanpeter michaelryanpeter force-pushed the osdocs-1929-RN-operator-discoverability branch from 16da952 to 60ca45c Compare April 27, 2023 14:41
@michaelryanpeter michaelryanpeter force-pushed the osdocs-1929-RN-operator-discoverability branch from 60ca45c to 7290ee2 Compare April 27, 2023 15:31
@michaelryanpeter michaelryanpeter merged commit f192e57 into openshift:enterprise-4.13 Apr 27, 2023
@michaelryanpeter michaelryanpeter deleted the osdocs-1929-RN-operator-discoverability branch October 26, 2023 16:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@tmalove tmalove tmalove left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@jianzhangbjz jianzhangbjz

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.13 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

4.13 GA

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@michaelryanpeter @ocpdocs-previewbot @jianzhangbjz @tmalove @mburke5678