-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
RHDEVDOCS 5244 Tekton Results documentation #63780
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
🤖 Updated build preview is available at: Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/25825 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Few things that, I think, were misunderstood or not clear:
- Both Results and Records can be of type PipelineRun or TaskRun, let's say there is a PR with 1 TR then the Result entry will have 2 Records associated with it. if there is a TR only, the Result will have only 1 record. Similary if logging is enabled, more records (of type log) will be associated.
- Result/Record UUID is not related to PR/TR UUID. But Name of the Result/Record is created using PR/TR UUID.
cicd/pipelines/using-tekton-results-for-openshift-pipelines-observability.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
cicd/pipelines/using-tekton-results-for-openshift-pipelines-observability.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good from my side. Few more suggestions.
cicd/pipelines/using-tekton-results-for-openshift-pipelines-observability.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rest looks fine to me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Few more changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should't link to yq (as its not Red Hat distributed code).
Note: everything you do with yq could be done with other bash (or RHEL provided programs).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me
/label peer-review-needed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reminder to squash to 1 commit before merge-review, as well. Thank you!
cicd/pipelines/using-tekton-results-for-openshift-pipelines-observability.adoc
Show resolved
Hide resolved
cicd/pipelines/using-tekton-results-for-openshift-pipelines-observability.adoc
Show resolved
Hide resolved
cicd/pipelines/using-tekton-results-for-openshift-pipelines-observability.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
cicd/pipelines/using-tekton-results-for-openshift-pipelines-observability.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
5597abc
to
61bf6dd
Compare
---- | ||
db_host: postgres.internal.example.com # <1> | ||
db_port: 5432 # <2> | ||
db_user: user # <3> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This isn't required. Please remove this. It's part of secret.
logs_api: true | ||
log_level: debug | ||
db_port: 5432 | ||
db_user: result |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please remove from here also.
Version(s):
4.12 and later
Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDEVDOCS-5244
Link to docs preview:
https://63780--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/cicd/pipelines/using-tekton-results-for-openshift-pipelines-observability
QE review:
Additional information:
The GitHub link https://github.com/google/cel-spec is already approved for OpenShift documentation, beacuse it is present in core OpenShift documentation here: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.13/operators/understanding/olm/olm-understanding-dependency-resolution.html#olm-cel_olm-understanding-dependency-resolution