Skip to content

Conversation

aspauldi
Copy link

@aspauldi aspauldi commented Sep 13, 2023

Version(s): 4.14

Issue: CNV-29048

Link to docs preview: New and changed features

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Sep 13, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 13, 2023

@aspauldi: This pull request references CNV-29048 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.14

Issue: CNV-29048

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 13, 2023
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Sep 13, 2023

🤖 Updated build preview is available at:
https://64674--docspreview.netlify.app

Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/31055

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 13, 2023

@aspauldi: This pull request references CNV-29048 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.14

Issue: CNV-29048

Link to docs preview: https://64674--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/virt/release_notes/virt-4-14-release-notes#virt-4-14-new

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 13, 2023

@aspauldi: This pull request references CNV-29048 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.14

Issue: CNV-29048

Link to docs preview: New and changed features

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@aspauldi
Copy link
Author

@sradco , I've created the release note. The link to the article won't work until it is published, but can you please review the note text? Thanks.

@aspauldi
Copy link
Author

@sradco, Can you take a look at the release note? Thanks!

//CNV-28732 Release note: NEW

//CNV-29048 Release note: NEW Metrics name changes
* Many OpenShift Virtualization metrics have changed. These changes could affect your custom dashboards. See link:https://access.redhat.com/articles/7028805[OpenShift Virtualization 4.14 metric changes] for details.
Copy link
Contributor

@sradco sradco Oct 1, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @aspauldi, Please comment that the link includes both metrics that changed name and deprecated metrics that would change in 4.15.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @sradco, do you mean that there are metrics whose names have changed in 4.14 and also alerts (not metrics) that are being deprecated in 4.14 and changed (but not removed) in 4.15?

When I look here, I see only a list of metric name changes in 4.14.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, it's all about metrics. I made a mistake in the comment and updated it now

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How would metrics deprecated in 4.14 change in 4.15? Would the metrics still exist in 4.15 (removal would happen at some point in the future, after 4.15) but be renamed?

@aspauldi
Copy link
Author

@kmajcher-rh, would you be able to look at this PR (in lieu of Shirly)? Thanks

@kmajcher-rh
Copy link

@aspauldi - i just have one question about "The following metrics are deprecated in 4.14 and will be changed in 4.15." section, which is followed by a table with list of metrics with old and new name. I assume new name will be effective in 4.15 only, and old name still works in 4.14? Is this how a reader should understand this?

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 12, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 12, 2023
@aspauldi
Copy link
Author

Hi @kmajcher-rh, I was confused about that too, what is meant by "The following metrics are deprecated in 4.14 and will be changed in 4.15." I had asked Shirly about that in a comment last week (see comment ^) and was awaiting her response. Perhaps we need to wait for Shirly to review?

@ctomasko
Copy link

ctomasko commented Oct 17, 2023

@aspauldi Please make sure to reference the correct BZ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179660 / Jira https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-27054 issue number. Please note that CNV-29048 is a tracker issue for the release note and the bug needs to reference the original BZ 2179660

@aspauldi
Copy link
Author

/label cnv

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the CNV Label for all CNV PRs label Oct 19, 2023
@aspauldi
Copy link
Author

Hi @sradco, When you are able, can you take a look at my question above? Thanks very much.

* You can use a xref:../../virt/virtual_machines/advanced_vm_management/virt-schedule-vms.adoc#virt-vm-custom-scheduler_virt-schedule-vms[custom scheduler] to schedule a virtual machine (VM) on a node.
//CNV-29048 Release note: NEW Metrics name changes
* Many OpenShift Virtualization metrics have changed. These changes could affect your custom dashboards. See link:https://access.redhat.com/articles/7028805[OpenShift Virtualization 4.14 metric changes] for details.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would say that "many metrics names changed or will be changed in the next version."

@aspauldi
Copy link
Author

@sradco, I've updated the note, with your new detail. You can find it in the New and changed features section of the release notes.

@dbasunag, can you review the release note?

Thanks.

Copy link

@ctomasko ctomasko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aspauldi Unfortunately, the link to https://access.redhat.com/articles/7028805 is a private link for internal Red Hat only, so it won't benefit our customers.
I recommend including both of the tables in the article (4.14 changed metrics and 4.14 deprecated metrics) in the release notes. @apinnick do you agree that we should include these tables since the link to the article is not accessible by customers?

//CNV-28729 Release note: New
* You can use a xref:../../virt/virtual_machines/advanced_vm_management/virt-schedule-vms.adoc#virt-vm-custom-scheduler_virt-schedule-vms[custom scheduler] to schedule a virtual machine (VM) on a node.
//CNV-29048 Release note: NEW Metrics name changes
* Many OpenShift Virtualization metrics have changed or will change in a future version. These changes could affect your custom dashboards. See link:https://access.redhat.com/articles/7028805[OpenShift Virtualization 4.14 metric changes] for details.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aspauldi the linked document has "PRIVATE: This document is for internal use and is not accessible to customers." header, is it appropriate for release note, that would be out for public consumption?

@sradco https://access.redhat.com/articles/7028805 includes metrics that would be renamed in 4.15. Referencing it without clearly mentioning which are getting updated in 4.14 vs 4.15, would be more confusing I feel.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dbasunag The linked article has not yet been published.

@sradco Is it ready for publication?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@apinnick I see the article https://access.redhat.com/articles/7028805 is published, but some of the metrics that are mentioned there did not get renamed till 4.15. This would be misleading. @sradco what do you suggest we do?

@aspauldi
Copy link
Author

Hi @dbasunag, the article is published. Can you please review? Thanks!

@ctomasko
Copy link

@sradco We would like you to review and clarify the wording in the article to be clear about what changed in 4.14. https://access.redhat.com/articles/7028805

The article must be clear about:

  1. the metrics that changed names in 4.14
  2. the metrics that are deprecated in 4.14

If there are metrics that will change in 4.15, please list them separately, or don't mention them at all since 4.15 is not yet released. Thank you

@sradco
Copy link
Contributor

sradco commented Oct 30, 2023

We need to notify our customers on coming changes in 4.15 so that they can plan to update their metrics collection pipelines in case they use an external monitoring stack. This is the reason we also list the metrics that are deprecated in 4.14 and in 4.15 will have a new name.

@aspauldi
Copy link
Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Oct 31, 2023
@mletalie
Copy link
Contributor

/label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Oct 31, 2023
@mletalie
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-label peer-review-needed
/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
/label peer-review-done
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 31, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 31, 2023

@aspauldi: This pull request references CNV-29048 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s): 4.14

Issue: CNV-29048

Link to docs preview: New and changed features

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@aspauldi
Copy link
Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Oct 31, 2023
@mletalie
Copy link
Contributor

/label peer-review-done

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR label Oct 31, 2023
@mletalie
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-label peer-review-needed
/remove-label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Oct 31, 2023
@mburke5678 mburke5678 added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Oct 31, 2023
@mburke5678 mburke5678 merged commit decf90e into openshift:enterprise-4.14 Oct 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CNV Label for all CNV PRs jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.