-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
[RHACS] [rhacs-docs-main] ROX-23633: Updating language in the Compliance Operator section #75728
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[RHACS] [rhacs-docs-main] ROX-23633: Updating language in the Compliance Operator section #75728
Conversation
|
@agantony: This pull request references ROX-23633 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/label RHACS |
|
/retest-required |
|
/retest |
|
🤖 Fri May 31 16:45:11 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: https://75728--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/ |
|
@agantony: This pull request references ROX-23633 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@agantony: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@agantony: This pull request references ROX-23633 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@agantony: This pull request references ROX-23633 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Will create a separate PR for 4.3 to avoid merge conflicts due to structural changes. |
|
@agantony: This pull request references ROX-23633 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
rhmdnd
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
|
@agantony: This pull request references ROX-23633 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
bfafc48 to
d9fae1d
Compare
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
d9fae1d to
a014d32
Compare
|
@agantony: This pull request references ROX-23633 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@agantony: This pull request references ROX-23633 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/retest |
|
@agantony: This pull request references ROX-23633 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@agantony: This pull request references ROX-23633 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
kcarmichael08
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One very minor change; otherwise, lgtm!
operating/manage-compliance-operator/compliance-operator-rhacs.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
operating/manage-compliance-operator/compliance-operator-rhacs.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
ROX23633 Review feedback ROX23633 Review feedback
a014d32 to
d13ffd1
Compare
|
/retest |
|
@agantony: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Version(s):
4.5+
Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ROX-23633
Link to docs preview:
https://75728--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-acs/latest/operating/manage-compliance-operator/compliance-operator-rhacs.html
SME review:
Additional information:
rhacs-docs-mainand cherry-pick to:rhacs-docs-4.5