ROX-19617: Update policy info #77200
Conversation
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
jira/valid-reference
|
@kcarmichael08: This pull request references ROX-19617 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
size/XS
|
🤖 Fri Jul 19 17:33:17 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: https://77200--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-acs/latest/operating/default-security-policies.html |
kcarmichael08
force-pushed
the
ROX-19617-policy-updates
branch
from
2292e2e to
3be85d5
Compare
kcarmichael08
force-pushed
the
ROX-19617-policy-updates
branch
from
3be85d5 to
1078348
Compare
|
@kcarmichael08: This pull request references ROX-19617 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@kcarmichael08: This pull request references ROX-19617 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
kcarmichael08
force-pushed
the
ROX-19617-policy-updates
branch
from
1078348 to
95328a6
Compare
kcarmichael08
force-pushed
the
ROX-19617-policy-updates
branch
from
95328a6 to
578e077
Compare
openshift-ci
bot
added
size/S
|
@kcarmichael08: This pull request references ROX-19617 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
kcarmichael08
force-pushed
the
ROX-19617-policy-updates
branch
2 times, most recently
from
1042636 to
0868fed
Compare
| | Container Memory Request | ||
| | Check for the amount of memory reserved for a given resource. | ||
| | Number, including fraction, of MB requested. | ||
| // Do we convert the K8s resource into MB (including convert MiB to MB) ? If so, the documentation should explain this conversion . |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Question for tech reviewers here ^^^
|
@kcarmichael08: This pull request references ROX-19617 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
kcarmichael08
force-pushed
the
ROX-19617-policy-updates
branch
from
0868fed to
9f6087b
Compare
kcarmichael08
force-pushed
the
ROX-19617-policy-updates
branch
from
9f6087b to
68e8a2d
Compare
openshift-ci
bot
added
size/M
|
@kcarmichael08: This pull request references ROX-19617 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
kcarmichael08
added
the
peer-review-needed
kcarmichael08
force-pushed
the
ROX-19617-policy-updates
branch
from
68e8a2d to
d374792
Compare
kcarmichael08
added
RHACS
| | Container Memory Request | ||
| | Check for the amount of memory reserved for a given resource. | ||
| | Number, including fraction, of MB requested. | ||
| // Do we convert the K8s resource into MB (including convert MiB to MB) ? If so, the documentation should explain this conversion . |
|
/label peer-review-in-progress |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
peer-review-in-progress
|
/label peer-review-done |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
peer-review-done
|
@kcarmichael08, Nice work! provided some suggestions for your consideration. Thanks |
kcarmichael08
force-pushed
the
ROX-19617-policy-updates
branch
from
d374792 to
50b66e7
Compare
kcarmichael08
removed
peer-review-in-progress
kcarmichael08
force-pushed
the
ROX-19617-policy-updates
branch
from
50b66e7 to
83962d1
Compare
|
@kcarmichael08: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/cherrypick rhacs-docs-4.4 |
|
/cherrypick rhacs-docs-4.5 |
|
@kcarmichael08: new pull request created: #79142 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@kcarmichael08: new pull request created: #79143 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
6 participants
Version(s):
4.4+
Issues:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ROX-19617
Links to docs previews:
https://77200--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-acs/latest/operating/default-security-policies.html
https://77200--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-acs/latest/operating/manage-security-policies.html#policy-criteria_manage-security-policies
QE review:
Additional information:
Technical reviewers: Please see question in comments at the end of PR - thank you!