-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
OCPBUGS-30108: Move scattered postinstall content to image config section and remove unpublished content #79596
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@abrennan89: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30108, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
🤖 Thu Aug 01 19:23:25 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
@abrennan89: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
@abrennan89: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30108 is in an unrecognized state (Verified) and will not be moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.13 |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.12 |
@abrennan89: new pull request created: #79886 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@abrennan89: new pull request created: #79887 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@abrennan89: new pull request created: #79888 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@abrennan89: new pull request created: #79889 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@abrennan89: #79596 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.13":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@abrennan89: #79596 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.12":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Version(s):
4.12+
Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-30108
Link to docs preview:
QE review: