Skip to content

OSSM-8307 Release notes troubleshooting for Pantheon #84142

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 28, 2024
Merged

OSSM-8307 Release notes troubleshooting for Pantheon #84142

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 28, 2024

Conversation

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Contributor

@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan commented Oct 25, 2024 •
edited
Loading

OSSM 3.0 TP1

This content was not required for TP 1 go live, but OSSM 3.0 is still in TP1 status so this applies to TP1.

Merge to: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/tree/service-mesh-docs-main

Cherry pick: to https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/tree/service-mesh-docs-3.0.0tp1

This PR is part of the standalone doc set for the OpenShift Service Mesh project. Kathryn is aware that this content applies for a product that is part of a Technology Preview release. The project is seeking feedback from early adopters.

Version(s):

Technology Preview

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSSM-8307

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

QE is not required for this PR.

Additional information:

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 25, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 25, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 25, 2024
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Oct 25, 2024 •
edited
Loading

🤖 Fri Oct 25 19:00:13 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://84142--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-service-mesh/latest/ossm-release-notes/ossm-release-notes-assembly.html

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 25, 2024

@gwynnemonahan: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan changed the title OSSM-8307 Release notes title for Pantheon OSSM-8307 Release notes troubleshooting for Pantheon Oct 25, 2024
@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Oct 25, 2024

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Oct 25, 2024
@adellape adellape added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Oct 25, 2024
@adellape adellape self-assigned this Oct 25, 2024
@adellape adellape added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Oct 25, 2024
@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Oct 25, 2024

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Oct 25, 2024
@Srivaralakshmi Srivaralakshmi added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR service-mesh Label for all Service Mesh PRs and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Oct 28, 2024
@Srivaralakshmi Srivaralakshmi added this to the Continuous Release milestone Oct 28, 2024
Srivaralakshmi
Srivaralakshmi reviewed Oct 28, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@Srivaralakshmi Srivaralakshmi left a comment •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, @gwynnemonahan: Nice work! Just a suggestion for you to consider. It would be nice to see some generic content about RN and the component before a Level 1 heading. Examples of generic content after Level 0 heading:

That way, there is consistency in how we present the content across the LP docs and users get a unified content experience. Hope this suggestion is helpful. Rest LGTM.
If you plan to incorporate the suggestion, please ping the squad to review and merge the revised content. If you plan to do it later, please create a JIRA for it and share the JIRA issue ID and link here. I will then merge this PR. Thanks!

@Srivaralakshmi Srivaralakshmi removed the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Oct 28, 2024
@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Contributor Author

gwynnemonahan commented Oct 28, 2024

Thanks @Srivaralakshmi . These are temporary rel notes for TP1, and this PR is specific to troubleshooting Pantheon.

All GA content, including GA rel notes, is already tracked in a different Jira.

@Srivaralakshmi Srivaralakshmi added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Oct 28, 2024
@Srivaralakshmi Srivaralakshmi merged commit 1017d02 into openshift:service-mesh-docs-main Oct 28, 2024
2 checks passed
@Srivaralakshmi
Copy link
Contributor

Srivaralakshmi commented Oct 28, 2024

/cherrypick service-mesh-docs-3.0.0tp1

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Oct 28, 2024

@Srivaralakshmi: new pull request created: #84157

In response to this:

/cherrypick service-mesh-docs-3.0.0tp1

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Oct 28, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

2 more reviewers

@Srivaralakshmi Srivaralakshmi Srivaralakshmi left review comments

@adellape adellape adellape approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@adellape adellape

Labels

lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR service-mesh Label for all Service Mesh PRs size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

Continuous Release

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@gwynnemonahan @ocpdocs-previewbot @Srivaralakshmi @openshift-cherrypick-robot @adellape @openshift-merge-robot