Skip to content

Conversation

eromanova97
Copy link
Contributor

@eromanova97 eromanova97 commented Nov 19, 2024

Version(s) for cherry-picking: none

Issue: OBSDOCS-1489

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
This PR aims for the preparating of 3 assemblies to be ready for the next steps. These are the main changes:

  • Managing metrics: biggest changes, the assembly is separated into administrator vs non-administrator journey:
    • This section will be moved to configuration section. [not changed]
    • The Querying metrics introduction module was deleted and the content from the module was moved to the quering procedure modules.
    • I also improved some content in those modules.
  • Reviewing monitoring dashboards: moved the introduction from assembly to its separate concept module.
  • Accessing monitoring APIs by using the CLI: In this assembly I fixed only small nits

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Nov 19, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 19, 2024

@eromanova97: This pull request references OBSDOCS-1489 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s) for cherry-picking: none

Issue: OBSDOCS-1489

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 19, 2024
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Nov 19, 2024

🤖 Wed Dec 04 09:13:40 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://85116--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

@eromanova97 eromanova97 force-pushed the OBSDOCS-1489 branch 3 times, most recently from b6297db to 6652824 Compare November 21, 2024 13:31
@eromanova97 eromanova97 changed the title [WIP] OBSDOCS-1489: Prepare the metrics sections for transition OBSDOCS-1489: Prepare the metrics sections for transition Nov 21, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 21, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 21, 2024

@eromanova97: This pull request references OBSDOCS-1489 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s) for cherry-picking: none

Issue: OBSDOCS-1489

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
This PR aims for the preparating of 3 assemblies to be ready for the next steps. These are the main changes:

  • Managing metrics: biggest changes, the assembly is separated into administrator vs non-administrator journey:
  • This section will be moved to configuration section. [not changed]
  • The Querying metrics introduction module was deleted and the content from the module was moved to the quering procedure modules.
  • I also improved some content in those modules.
  • Reviewing monitoring dashboards: moved the introducting from assembly to its separate concept module.
  • Accessing monitoring APIs by using the CLI: In this assembly I fixed only small nits

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 21, 2024

@eromanova97: This pull request references OBSDOCS-1489 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s) for cherry-picking: none

Issue: OBSDOCS-1489

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:
This PR aims for the preparating of 3 assemblies to be ready for the next steps. These are the main changes:

  • Managing metrics: biggest changes, the assembly is separated into administrator vs non-administrator journey:
  • This section will be moved to configuration section. [not changed]
  • The Querying metrics introduction module was deleted and the content from the module was moved to the quering procedure modules.
  • I also improved some content in those modules.
  • Reviewing monitoring dashboards: moved the introduction from assembly to its separate concept module.
  • Accessing monitoring APIs by using the CLI: In this assembly I fixed only small nits

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Comment on lines +9 to +12
// About monitoring dashboards
include::modules/monitoring-about-monitoring-dashboards.adoc[leveloffset=+1]
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The introduction is now included here

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call. Can you add a very short summary before the module so we don't get back-to-back headings?
image

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added a short sentence as you suggested, because this will not be the final assembly, I am just adding the same first sentence from "about mointoring dashboards" as a stand-in 😄

@eromanova97 eromanova97 force-pushed the OBSDOCS-1489 branch 2 times, most recently from b629430 to 7c869e3 Compare December 3, 2024 08:35
@juzhao
Copy link

juzhao commented Dec 3, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 3, 2024
@eromanova97
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Dec 3, 2024
@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Dec 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks great! Just a few things to look at, pretty trivial considering the amount of work you've done here.

/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
/remove-label peer-review-needed
/label peer-review-done

Comment on lines +9 to +12
// About monitoring dashboards
include::modules/monitoring-about-monitoring-dashboards.adoc[leveloffset=+1]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call. Can you add a very short summary before the module so we don't get back-to-back headings?
image

Comment on lines 21 to 40
.Example dashboard in the Administrator perspective
image::monitoring-dashboard-administrator.png[]

Use the *Developer* perspective to access Kubernetes compute resources dashboards that provide the following application metrics for a selected project:

* CPU usage
* Memory usage
* Bandwidth information
* Packet rate information
.Example dashboard in the Developer perspective
image::observe-dashboard-developer.png[] No newline at end of file
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See SSG guidance on screenshots. In my opinion, these two do add value, but they still need alt text for screen readers.

I think the main point of including them is to demonstrate the differences, so it might work well to explain the different panels available rather than trying to fully explain the contents.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good idea, thank you for pointing this out! I am not sure I would want to include it in this PR, I will add it as one of the tasks for this additional enhancement PR: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-1527
as that one will be dealing with the screenshots already.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good to me!

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Dec 3, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 4, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 4, 2024

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 4, 2024

@eromanova97: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@eromanova97
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Dec 4, 2024
@bscott-rh bscott-rh added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR labels Dec 4, 2024
@bscott-rh bscott-rh self-assigned this Dec 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@bscott-rh bscott-rh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Merge review LGTM.

@bscott-rh bscott-rh merged commit f76ca6d into openshift:monitoring-docs-restructure Dec 4, 2024
2 checks passed
@eromanova97 eromanova97 deleted the OBSDOCS-1489 branch December 5, 2024 13:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants