Skip to content

Conversation

adellape
Copy link
Contributor

@adellape adellape commented Feb 20, 2025

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-10370

Version: 4.18

Preview: New features and enhancements -> Extensions (OLMv1)

[Note for reviewers] If you see any instances of "Branch Build" in the previews, those will be rendered as "4.18" after merge in the final publication.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 20, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Feb 20, 2025

🤖 Thu Feb 20 21:02:46 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://88927--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

@adellape adellape force-pushed the 418_rn_pt2 branch 2 times, most recently from 60873d8 to 93f2026 Compare February 20, 2025 04:48
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 20, 2025
@adellape adellape added this to the Planned for 4.18 GA milestone Feb 20, 2025
@adellape adellape added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Feb 20, 2025
@xenolinux xenolinux added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Feb 20, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@xenolinux xenolinux left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2 similar comments and LGTM

@xenolinux xenolinux added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Feb 20, 2025
@emmajiafan
Copy link

OSDK part lgtm

@adellape adellape force-pushed the 418_rn_pt2 branch 3 times, most recently from a22732e to fbd330b Compare February 20, 2025 17:02
Copy link

@bandrade bandrade left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 20, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 20, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 20, 2025

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@adellape adellape force-pushed the 418_rn_pt2 branch 3 times, most recently from cb5c39f to a08f34b Compare February 20, 2025 19:31
@LalatenduMohanty
Copy link
Member

I wonder if we should mention https://operator-framework.github.io/operator-controller/project/olmv1_limitations/ in the release notes. It is not a blocker for this PR but might be helpful when someone going through the release notes.

@adellape adellape force-pushed the 418_rn_pt2 branch 2 times, most recently from aa28b0b to 501dbe0 Compare February 20, 2025 20:45
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 20, 2025

@adellape: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@adellape adellape merged commit 0d161b3 into openshift:enterprise-4.18 Feb 20, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.18 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants